> On 18 Dec 2016, at 06:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I thought we were talking about deprecating any random code in favor of
> Commons RNG?
>
> Gary
I guess that depends on the scope of RNG. Our previous conversation about
RandomUtils made sense (LANG-1299), since that was about the functional
I thought we were talking about deprecating any random code in favor of
Commons RNG?
Gary
On Dec 17, 2016 10:39 PM, "Duncan Jones" wrote:
> On reflection, a bad choice of subject line. The other methods are
> Unicode-capable, but just very rooted in thinking about char data types.
>
> > On 18 D
On reflection, a bad choice of subject line. The other methods are
Unicode-capable, but just very rooted in thinking about char data types.
> On 18 Dec 2016, at 06:38, Duncan Jones wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’ve created a variation of RandomStringUtils.random(), which generates the
> specified n
Hi all,
I’ve created a variation of RandomStringUtils.random(), which generates the
specified number of code points (rather than chars).
Implementation can be seen here
(https://gist.github.com/dmjones500/da2f61a0234f428748417bf1443c0dff).
Signature is:
public static String randomUnicode(f
Sounds good to me Thomas. Let me know if I can help on small tasks.
Le 17 déc. 2016 12:23, "Thomas Vandahl" a écrit :
On 15.12.16 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just wanted to get in touch with you to know if a release is planned and
if
> not how we can plan it.
>
> For the back
On 15.12.16 22:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just wanted to get in touch with you to know if a release is planned and if
> not how we can plan it.
>
> For the background: we got some tomee users requesting it (
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/JCS-beta-2-bug-td4680745.ht
