On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 11:49:04 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
I gave this a try with MATH-1397 => COMPLEX-4. Please let me know if
I
missed a step
The "link" to the new report.
or otherwise made an error.
I don't think so.
I noticed that a specific "10e-12" tolerance was used in several
unit
I gave this a try with MATH-1397 => COMPLEX-4. Please let me know if I
missed a step or otherwise made an error.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 18:58:58 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote:
>
>> Gilles - would this be the preferred way to handle the split of
>> comm
Hi.
How about renaming the component to "Commons Numbers" (or another name
if preferred) that would contain the following modules:
* commons-numbers-core (with classes such as "Precision").
* commons-numbers-complex
* commons-numbers-quaternion
* commons-numbers-fraction
* commons-numbers-co
