[CONFIGURATION]: JavaDoc for generated classes (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1)

> Am 07.02.2017 um 08:29 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Should we generate code in its own package? Let’s move this to it’s own thread… Generating the classes in their own packe would be an option. The package could have a name that makes clear that the classes are generated. But I’d leave that t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

Should we generate code in its own package? Gary On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Oliver Heger < > oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>: > > > > > > > > Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: > >> +1 > >> > >> bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

> Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Oliver Heger : > > > > Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> +1 >> >> bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. >> src zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. >> src zip RAT check OK. >> src zip CLIRR check OK. >> >> Building with 'mvn clean test' OK. >> >> Building site with 'mvn

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > can you try export LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 ? > I suppose I wait on this for now. I'm curious to see how it shakes out with the LC_ALL export. Ray -- as soon as I finish up the release, I would be happy to have another s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hi Bruno, can you try export LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 ? Think some tests can desire to force the locale maybe (have the same having a french locale by default) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hi Rob, Thanks for preparing this beta release! And also thanks for the great work on [text]! I agree with other votes on the Checkstyle issues as non blockers. And I can help writing/reviewing the user guide. However, I have the following tests failing: /* --- snip -- */ Results : Failed

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hi Rob, On 30.01.17 15:14, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4). [...] Artifacts look good, signatures are ok, site looks good. My guess would be if you use Eclipse you can iron out most of the checkstyle errors at once wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.1 based on RC1

On 05.02.17 18:24, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: > +1 > > bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > src zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > src zip RAT check OK. > src zip CLIRR check OK. > > Building with 'mvn clean test' OK. > > Building site with 'mvn site' > > Using: > > Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c0

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #32: COMMONSRDF-55: Handle Jena's urn:x-arq:DefaultGraph a...

Github user stain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32 Note that option (2) would also add potential inconsistency between Commons RDF `.getGraphName().isPresent()` and `asJenaQuad().isDefaultGraph()`, which is unfortunate, but only in that from-foreig

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #32: COMMONSRDF-55: Handle Jena's urn:x-arq:DefaultGraph a...

Github user stain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32 I guess it's a question of where we put the "inconsistency" barrier. We can probably assume that in the odd case that `urn:x-arq:DefaultGraph` appear literally in a non-Jena `IRI` or a non-Jena `Qu

[GitHub] commons-rdf issue #32: COMMONSRDF-55: Handle Jena's urn:x-arq:DefaultGraph a...

Github user stain commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/32 The thing is a Commons RDF `JenaQuad` has in a way two feet into Jena - the underlying Jena `Quad` as well as the underlying `Node` instances (which would be wrapped as `RDFTerm` instances).

Re: [Numbers] Process for merging feature branch?

On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:58:46 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: I'm not sure if it's just me or something else, but I don't see how to resolve the issue in JIRA. I have a Comment button, an Agile Board button and a More menu with options Attach Files, Attach Screenshot, Add Vote, Voters, Stop Watchi

Re: [Numbers] Process for merging feature branch?

I'm not sure if it's just me or something else, but I don't see how to resolve the issue in JIRA. I have a Comment button, an Agile Board button and a More menu with options Attach Files, Attach Screenshot, Add Vote, Voters, Stop Watching, Watchers, Create Sub-Task, Link and Clone options. On Sun

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so > I’d like to call a vote to release Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1. > > Commons Configuration 2.1.1 RC1 is available for review her