Re: Things in a POM file that are not probably incorrect

Hello Simon, > Am 27.06.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Simon Spero : > >1.5 >1.5 >org.apache.commons.functor > > JDK 9 cannot generate or parse class files compiled with -target 1.5 [1]. > > Per the JPMS Armistice talks, "Automatic-Module-Name" header should only > be added to jars that h

Things in a POM file that are not probably incorrect

1.5 1.5 org.apache.commons.functor JDK 9 cannot generate or parse class files compiled with -target 1.5 [1]. Per the JPMS Armistice talks, "Automatic-Module-Name" header should only be added to jars that have been tested under JDK 9 [2]. Also, javac now supports the new "--release

Re: [FUNCTOR] Why do we have an API module?

On Jun 25, 2017 5:54 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: Hi, > Am 24.06.2017 um 20:19 schrieb Matt Benson : > > TBH, I don't know that I think there's a reason to do such a library unless it's really a game changer. Currently functor is somehow in limbo state. It has been promoted to proper, but there

Re: [configuration] checkstyle fails build

Am 23.06.2017 um 17:24 schrieb Allon Mureinik: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> >> >> Am 23.06.2017 um 08:58 schrieb Allon Mureinik: >>> The root cause, IMHO, is having failValidation=false configured in the >>> pom.xml. This way, when you introduce a new problem yo