[lang] Commons Lang 2.x release for Java 9

2017-09-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I'd like to prepare a new release of Commons Lang 2 that addresses the Java 9 compatibility. I have two items in mind for this update, the automatic module name in the manifest of course, but also the SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtLeast() method that is broken with Java 9 and throws an Except

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

2017-09-29 Thread Pascal Schumacher
After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b). Cheers, Pascal Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins: Options: (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang] and pull in Amey’s pull request moving it into [text]. (b)

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

2017-09-29 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:11:07 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote: After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b). Cheers, Pascal Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins: Options: (a) leave RandomStringUtils deprecated in [lang

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

2017-09-29 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 29.09.2017 um 10:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher : > > After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomStringUtils > fits into [lang], so I'm for option (b). +1 > > Cheers, > Pascal > > Am 28.09.2017 um 23:26 schrieb Rob Tompkins: >> Options: >> >> (a) leave RandomStringUti

Re: [lang] Commons Lang 2.x release for Java 9

2017-09-29 Thread Gary Gregory
I think we should keep the changes to a minimum. Gary On Sep 29, 2017 02:08, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to prepare a new release of Commons Lang 2 that addresses the > Java 9 compatibility. I have two items in mind for this update, the > automatic module name in the manifest

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS 2.2 from RC1.

2017-09-29 Thread Gary Gregory
Would a few of you please find the time to review this RC? Thank you in advance for your input, Gary On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released, so I would like to rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1

2017-09-29 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 28.09.17 19:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Do I need to cancel this vote? Cant relaunch a vote before ~2 weeks if so > (will be travelling) but happy to catch up after if you think it is the way > to go. I'm afraid so. You published 2.2.2-SNAPSHOT to the release area. You probably need to roll

Re: [lang][text] TEXT-101: RandomStringUtils

2017-09-29 Thread Amey Jadiye
Okey, no problem folks. I'm going to close my PR. also we might need to release lang-3.6.1 for undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils if lang-3.7 is far. Regards, Amey On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > After thinking more about it, I came the conclusion that RandomS

[GitHub] commons-text issue #62: TEXT-101: Moved RandomStringUtils to Commons-text

2017-09-29 Thread ameyjadiye
Github user ameyjadiye commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62 As per discussion on Dev ML we are undoing deprecation of RandomStringUtils in Lang and discarding this solution. --- -

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #62: TEXT-101: Moved RandomStringUtils to Commons-...

2017-09-29 Thread ameyjadiye
Github user ameyjadiye closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/62 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1

2017-09-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Cancelling then :(. Thanks guys for your help and feedbacks. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Support Percent-Encoding (described in RFC3986 and RFC7578)

2017-09-29 Thread Giannis Sermetziadis
Hi there. I already created a Jira ticket for this (CODEC-240), but then found the contribution instructions :) My suggestion is to provide a codec that implements the Percent-Encoding as defined in RFC3986 and RFC7578. This is similar to URLCodec but does not force the ' ' to '+' encoding and oth