[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.5.0 based on RC1

This VOTE passes with the following votes (3 binding +1's , 2 non-binding +1's): - Matt Sicker (non-binding) - Bruno P. Kinoshita - Sergio Fernández (non-binding) - Oliver Heger - Gary Gregory Thank you all, Gary On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.5.0 based on RC1

My +1 Gary On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Pool 2.4.3 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons > Pool 2.5.0. > > Apache Commons Pool 2.5.0 RC1 is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.5.0 based on RC1

Thank you! Gary On Dec 19, 2017 14:04, "Oliver Heger" wrote: > Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site > look good. > > +1 > > Oliver > > Am 16.12.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.5.0 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 16.12.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Gary Gregory: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > Commons Pool 2.4.3 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons >

Re: [lang] Add a DaemonThreadFactory

Am 19.12.2017 um 17:27 schrieb Gary Gregory: > I keep on copying this from project to project and it seems fitting for > Commons Lang: In the concurrent package, there is the BasicThreadFactory class. Could this class satisfy your needs or can it be extended? Oliver > > import

Re: Security mailing list

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Request submitted! Thanks a lot! -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

Re: Security mailing list

Request submitted! Gary On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 5:22 PM, sebb wrote: > > > selfserve.apache.org > > > Access restricted to PMC chairs only! > > So, it looks like a task for Gary? > >

Re: Security mailing list

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 5:22 PM, sebb wrote: > selfserve.apache.org Access restricted to PMC chairs only! So, it looks like a task for Gary? Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

[lang] Add a DaemonThreadFactory

I keep on copying this from project to project and it seems fitting for Commons Lang: import java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory; import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong; public final class DaemonThreadFactory implements ThreadFactory { private final static AtomicLong COUNT = new

Re: Security mailing list

selfserve.apache.org On 19 December 2017 at 13:58, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Jira not required. Use The standard mailing list request form. If you >> request a security@ list the extra

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.5.0 based on RC1

Thank you for checking out the RC. I need other PMC members to review please :-) Gary On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > So far I've check: > > * Source release matches with source repository. > * Signatures and digests. > *

Re: Security mailing list

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Jira not required. Use The standard mailing list request form. If you request > a security@ list the extra stuff (make it private, cc securiry@a.o on all > mail) happens automatically. Thanks, Mark! But what is the

Re: Security mailing list

On 19 December 2017 11:37:48 GMT+00:00, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >Okay, in my opinion the response indicates, that my proposal is >acceptable to all. Do we need a formal vote? (I hope not.) So, how do >we proceed? Would it be okay for me to file a Jira issue? > >Thanks,

Re: Security mailing list

Okay, in my opinion the response indicates, that my proposal is acceptable to all. Do we need a formal vote? (I hope not.) So, how do we proceed? Would it be okay for me to file a Jira issue? Thanks, Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons JCS 2.2.1 based on RC3

quick ping: where are we exactly - trying to close that topic before next year ;)? From my understanding current issues are not blocking and we could move forward if the release note is fixed manually after the vote. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog