On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:33:48 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
On 04/12/2018 15:15, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables
following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verse
Results with 20 iterations:
RNG BoxMuller Marsaglia Ziggurat
ISAAC 0.948779993 0.53293786390.2799722904
JDK 1.06528391790.64108084960.3241359248
KISS0.98570743390.47010378670.2574427254
MT 1.02886323360.54358466380.2935301968
MT_64
On 04/12/2018 15:15, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the BoxMullerNo
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:11:44 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I’ll try to get to validation on this by the end of the day,
Thanks!
unless
@Gilles, you want to take into account the vote below.
I don't think anything mentioned is blocking (cf. my answer
in the other post).
[Hmm, it mostly stems fr
On 04/12/2018 14:08, Alex Herbert wrote:
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the BoxMullerNormalizedGaussianSampler
have all improved nearly 2-fold which is
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
>> +0 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
>> the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
>> 1.1). I note t
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the
BoxMullerNormalizedGaussianSampler
have all i
I’ll try to get to validation on this by the end of the day, unless @Gilles,
you want to take into account the vote below.
-Rob
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> +0 (non-binding)
>
>
> The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following the
> changes to
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the BoxMullerNormalizedGaussianSampler
have all improved nearly 2-fold which is strange. The code appear
Hi.
This one fails after a 15 minutes timeout.[1]
Gilles
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Commons/job/commons-geometry/25/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
Hi.
Any clue why Jenkins fails the build for module "commons-rng-sampling"?
Regards,
Gilles
[1]
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Commons/job/commons-rng/modules
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache
11 matches
Mail list logo