Re: [GitHub] vanzin commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

2019-01-03 Thread Alex Remily
Thanks again. I'll have a go at it. On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:40 PM GitBox wrote: > vanzin commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward > compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 > URL: > https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/92#issuecomment-451254190 > > >If you use

[GitHub] vanzin commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

2019-01-03 Thread GitBox
vanzin commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/92#issuecomment-451254190 If you use runtime checks, you don't need to touch the build at all. The same JNI library should work

[GitHub] aremily commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

2019-01-03 Thread GitBox
aremily commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/92#issuecomment-451253240 It's building the JNI library or libraries that I'll have to work out. I don't routinely code in C,

[GitHub] vanzin commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

2019-01-03 Thread GitBox
vanzin commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/92#issuecomment-451249633 It really should not be hard. The concept is the same you're using on the JNA side: check things at

[GitHub] aremily commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1

2019-01-03 Thread GitBox
aremily commented on issue #92: OpenSSL 1.1.0 updates with backward compatibility for OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.0.1 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/pull/92#issuecomment-451248384 Thanks for the feedback. Let me think on it a bit more and I'll take it up again once I've come up

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

2019-01-03 Thread Amey Jadiye
Hello Maxim / All I put little more efforts to find out the possible cause of the error. In the clirr code, I found the reason for this error and same is documented in clirr documentation [1]. A method declaration has been added to the specified interface. This is always reported as a

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Commons collections 4.3

2019-01-03 Thread Gary Gregory
I am slowly coming back to FOSS setting up a new laptop and house... may someone summarize where we stand on this vote? Gary On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:42 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > This is a [VOTE] for releasing > Apache Commons collections 4.3 > > Tag name: > collections-4.3-RC2