On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 21:27, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Ensuring projects are source compatible with 1.8 but buildable and
> usable using Java 11 or whatever the latest release is at the time
> (currently 12) seems like a good compromise for most of the libraries.
> I wouldn't require 9+ in anything
Ensuring projects are source compatible with 1.8 but buildable and
usable using Java 11 or whatever the latest release is at the time
(currently 12) seems like a good compromise for most of the libraries.
I wouldn't require 9+ in anything unless it's pointless for earlier
releases of Java or if it'
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 18:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:53 PM sebb wrote:
>
> > I see no reason to update to Java 8 unless continuing with Java 7
> > becomes a big hassle.
> >
> > Why penalise people stuck on Java 7 unnecessarily?
> >
>
> I see it the other way around: Why
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:53 PM sebb wrote:
> I see no reason to update to Java 8 unless continuing with Java 7
> becomes a big hassle.
>
> Why penalise people stuck on Java 7 unnecessarily?
>
I see it the other way around: Why do we want to handcuff new development
on a dead platforms? For new
I see no reason to update to Java 8 unless continuing with Java 7
becomes a big hassle.
Why penalise people stuck on Java 7 unnecessarily?
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 15:31, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> That seems reasonable.
>
> > On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > This comes up f
>Well then, I guess that we consider the micro-tasks which I evoked in
my previous message: Clone the repository and build the code.
This is explained in more details here:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/developers.html
Please try it, and then let us know how it went.
I cloned t
That seems reasonable.
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This comes up from time to time and I can only offer my usual "if you want
> support for a dead version of Java, feel free to provide a PR" We can
> always provide 1.12.1 for Java 7 security fixes or other fixes deem
This comes up from time to time and I can only offer my usual "if you want
support for a dead version of Java, feel free to provide a PR" We can
always provide 1.12.1 for Java 7 security fixes or other fixes deemed
important enough.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 11:20 AM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1
+1, but there are considerable projects out there that would want us to
maintain backwards compatibility with Java 7.
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Now that Codec 1.12 is out, I plan on updating from Java 7 to Java 8.
>
> Gary
--
Hi All,
Now that Codec 1.12 is out, I plan on updating from Java 7 to Java 8.
Gary
Hello.
Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 14:48, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit :
>
> Dear Sir,
> >I don't understand what you mean be "screening tests". Sorry.
> Certain organisations had held certain micro tasks to be performed by
> students in order to increase their chances of selection for the project. I
>
Dear Sir,
>I don't understand what you mean be "screening tests". Sorry.
Certain organisations had held certain micro tasks to be performed by students
in order to increase their chances of selection for the project. I was asking
about those tasks in reference to our current project.
>Overall, t
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Testing RC tag checkout.
>
> Not a blocker, the changes.xml file needs a release date and description.
Doh. Thanks.
>
> Using:
>
> mvn clean package site
>
> On:
>
> Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719
+1
Testing RC tag checkout.
Not a blocker, the changes.xml file needs a release date and description.
Using:
mvn clean package site
On:
Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
2018-10-24T14:41:47-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.0\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_20
My +1
Gary
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:26 PM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons BCEL 6.3 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons BCEL 6.3.1.
>
> Apache Commons BCEL 6.3.1 RC1 is available for revie
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:29 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 21, 2019, at 10:22 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
> wrote:
> >
> > Nearly all vendors I have seen announced to follow voluntarily or
> commercial guaranteed the OpenJDK LTS versions (11, some 8) (Redhat,
> adoptopenjdk, Azul, ojdkbuild, sa
Hi.
Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 08:28, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit :
>
>
> Dear sir,
>
> >>But first things first: Have you set up a programming environment for
> making your experiments?
> I have IntelliJ IDEA community edition along with Netbeans 8.2 with Java
> 8u191 installed.
> For repository purpo
Dear sir,
>>But first things first: Have you set up a programming environment for
making your experiments?
I have IntelliJ IDEA community edition along with Netbeans 8.2 with Java 8u191
installed.
For repository purposes, I’m using Github Desktop. Any other software I should
install for this u
18 matches
Mail list logo
