On 17/04/2019 16:43, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Le lun. 15 avr. 2019 à 01:03, Alex Herbert a écrit :
On 14 Apr 2019, at 01:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
On 11/04/2019 13:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
[...]
Not adding a dedicated method would mean everyone has to do this:
Hello.
Le lun. 15 avr. 2019 à 01:03, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On 14 Apr 2019, at 01:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> >> On 11/04/2019 13:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > [...]
> Not adding a dedicated method would mean everyone has to do this:
>
>
Sounds reasonable.
Gary
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:17 AM sebb wrote:
> Confluence supports LDAP member attributes only [1] currently.
>
> This means we could automatically grant access to Commons committers.
> However it's not currently possible to restrict access to PMC members
> - but I'm
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:16 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> Confluence supports LDAP member attributes only [1] currently.
>
> This means we could automatically grant access to Commons committers.
> However it's not currently possible to restrict access to PMC members
> - but I'm not sure that we need
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 16:15, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 10:05, sebb wrote:
> > Note that Java 7 has extended support until at least July 2022:
> > https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html
>
> Right, but does that mean that OpenJDK (and its various
Confluence supports LDAP member attributes only [1] currently.
This means we could automatically grant access to Commons committers.
However it's not currently possible to restrict access to PMC members
- but I'm not sure that we need that.
I propose to ask Infra to allow Commons committer write
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 10:05, sebb wrote:
> Note that Java 7 has extended support until at least July 2022:
> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html
Right, but does that mean that OpenJDK (and its various forks) will
also keep 1.7 input and output formats for just
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 15:39, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> How long until javac removes -source and -target 1.7? They already
> removed 1.6 in Java 12. At some point, we'll be forced to upgrade just
> to remain source compatible with recent compilers. That's likely not
> for another year or more,
How long until javac removes -source and -target 1.7? They already
removed 1.6 in Java 12. At some point, we'll be forced to upgrade just
to remain source compatible with recent compilers. That's likely not
for another year or more, though, so not an immediate problem; just
something to consider
