Hi,
I checked out my GitHub page, and since I have email privacy enabled, my actual
email does not come up in edits/merges, it is only used and available for
account based operations.
Should I change that ?
Here’s the result of running “git config –list” on cmd as required :
C:\Users\abhi1>git
> On May 8, 2019, at 6:34 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
>> Le jeu. 9 mai 2019 à 00:25, a écrit :
>>
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>
>> aherbert pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git
>>
> On 8 May 2019, at 20:02, Abhishek Dhadwal wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
> If you want to look at the Javadocs then you can build them locally from
> the commons-rng-examples/examples-jmh directory by running:
>
> mvn javadoc:javadoc
>
> The output will be in:
>
> target/site/apidocs/index.html
>
> On 8 May 2019, at 23:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 9 mai 2019 à 00:25, a écrit :
>>
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>
>> aherbert pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git
>>
>>
Le jeu. 9 mai 2019 à 00:25, a écrit :
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aherbert pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this
It looks to me like the EJML library is the best choice for linear algebra
right now, is well supported, and we should not reinvent the wheel unless
we have the motivation and expertise to do so.
EJML is under the Apache 2.0 license which I read to mean we can use it in
any derivative way we
Le mer. 8 mai 2019 à 18:38, Eric Barnhill a écrit :
>
> Since it looks like we will have some development in these libraries this
> summer (whee!) I propose starting 'develop' branches for these libraries.
+1
For "Statistics", it makes sense since there might be some flux,
as alternative design
> On May 8, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Ben Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The regression module will require a lot of linear math, specifically matrix
> operations which I’ve heard is outdated. Are there any updates on it’s
> development? Is this someone’s GSoC project? If not I could try to help by
Hi Gary,
Created a draft PR to receive feedback.
https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/26/files . What do you
think?
Regards,
Tomo
From: Gary Gregory
Date: Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
> Great. I look forward to seeing what you'll come up with :-)
>
> On Tue,
Hello,
The regression module will require a lot of linear math, specifically matrix
operations which I’ve heard is outdated. Are there any updates on it’s
development? Is this someone’s GSoC project? If not I could try to help by
attempting to start porting regression essential operations. But
Since it looks like we will have some development in these libraries this
summer (whee!) I propose starting 'develop' branches for these libraries.
The mentees and others can then create feature branches off of develop, and
submit pull requests for feature branches into develop. Then develop is
Great. I look forward to seeing what you'll come up with :-)
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:27 PM Tomo Suzuki
wrote:
> I found the discussion on getInstance method had incurred performance
> degradation https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-186 .
>
> From the JIRA:
> > This feature could return
Ok sir. I will start a new thread with the name of " [statistics] Mode
function for Cauchy distribution".
Hope that's fine.
Thanks for reminding me.
On Wed, 8 May 2019, 5:48 pm Gilles Sadowski, wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I see that a discussion about is still going on on GitHub[1]; thus,
> I remind that
Hi.
I see that a discussion about is still going on on GitHub[1]; thus,
I remind that API changes *must* be agreed on here. [Please start
a new thread.]
Best,
Gilles
[1] https://github.com/apache/commons-statistics/pull/4#discussion_r282004202
14 matches
Mail list logo
