RE: [GSoC][STATISTICS][Regression] Architecture ImplementationSuggestions

Hello, This post has been split into four JIRA sub-tasks of STATISTICS-8 as suggested: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STATISTICS-8 Hopefully anyone who has input will comment under each sub-task thread. The UML diagrams are also visible on the description and attachments inside

Re: [Lang] BigDecimalStatistics proposition

Hi. Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 22:45, Aleksander Ściborek a écrit : > > Should I create a new Maven commons-statistics submodule for this? [If the current idea is put the functionality in "Commons Statistics", you should change this thread's "Subject:" line.] Then, yes, there should be a new

Re: [Lang] BigDecimalStatistics proposition

Should I create a new Maven commons-statistics submodule for this? Besides the BigDecimalStatistics I'm going to create support for downstream operators for BigDecimals and maybe BigIntegers. On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 03:36, Eric Barnhill wrote: > Yes. This sounds great for commons-statistics.

Re: [io] NIO2 and non-default file system support

Hi Mark, Mining JIRA or GitHub PRs is always a good idea. Aside from that, I'd say just work on something that interests you. Gary On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:53 PM Chesney, Mark wrote: > Thank you both. I'd be willing to make some more contributions towards > modernization of the API if you

Re: [io] NIO2 and non-default file system support

I previously noted my ideas in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-595 On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 14:53, Chesney, Mark wrote: > > Thank you both. I'd be willing to make some more contributions towards > modernization of the API if you have some idea where the greatest need or > highest value

RE: [io] NIO2 and non-default file system support

Thank you both. I'd be willing to make some more contributions towards modernization of the API if you have some idea where the greatest need or highest value is. Are there any existing JIRA issues that come to mind? Regards, Mark > -Original Message- > From: Matt Sicker > Sent:

RE: [IO] Update to Java 8

I think it's a good idea. A recent update of the parent POM version seems to have broken the Travis build for Java 7. Discontinuing Java 7 support would make that a non-issue. > -Original Message- > From: Rob Tompkins > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 8:10 AM > To: Commons Developers List

Re: [io] NIO2 and non-default file system support

Thanks, Gary! On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 05:37, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The one patch has been merged. > > Gary > > On Thu, May 16, 2019, 02:03 Matt Sicker wrote: > > > I’ve been interested in seeing IO be updated to include support for using > > Path instead of just File. I can review your PR this

Re: [IO] Update to Java 8

On 5/15/2019 2:42 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi all, Time to update to Java 8 methinks. +1 Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [rng] stress test results

> On 16 May 2019, at 15:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 16:04, Alex Herbert > a écrit : >> >> >> >>> On 16 May 2019, at 14:42, Gilles Sadowski >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> Le jeu. 16 mai

Re: [rng] stress test results

Hi. Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 16:04, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 16 May 2019, at 14:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 12:06, Alex Herbert > > a écrit : > >> > >> I have run the stress test using the new application. The

Re: [rng] stress test results

> On 16 May 2019, at 14:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 12:06, Alex Herbert > a écrit : >> >> I have run the stress test using the new application. The new application >> has two major changes over the previous application:

Re: [rng] stress test results

Hello. Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 12:06, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I have run the stress test using the new application. The new application has > two major changes over the previous application: > > 1. It detects the platform byte-order and sends the bits in the correct order > to be read by a C

Re: [GSoC] commons-gsoc Thursday meeting?

Hi Eric. I won't be able to attend (but I've already provided comments on the ML). Best, Gilles Le mar. 14 mai 2019 à 18:57, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > > On 5/14/2019 12:47 PM, Eric Barnhill wrote: > > Should we have another Slack meeting at the same time this Thursday, 5pm > > UTC (9am

Re: [GSoC][STATISTICS][Regression] Architecture Implementation Suggestions

Hello. Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 10:02, Ben Nguyen a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > I have some broad general ideas about how the regression module should be > structured, as outlined in my proposal briefly with UMLs > > This is the current implementation inside commons-math-stat-regression: It seems

Re: [io] NIO2 and non-default file system support

The one patch has been merged. Gary On Thu, May 16, 2019, 02:03 Matt Sicker wrote: > I’ve been interested in seeing IO be updated to include support for using > Path instead of just File. I can review your PR this week, though I’m > certainly not the only one who can. > > On Tue, May 14, 2019

[rng] stress test results

I have run the stress test using the new application. The new application has two major changes over the previous application: 1. It detects the platform byte-order and sends the bits in the correct order to be read by a C application 2. The bridge to TestU01 has been updated to use all the

Re: [rng] Information Pertaining to Running Benchmarks

> On 16 May 2019, at 06:45, Abhishek Dhadwal wrote: > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:26 AM Alex Herbert > wrote: > > >> You have to run Maven from the appropriate sub-directory. Your screenshot >> on Slack shows you are in the top level commons-rng directory: >> >> $ cd

[GSoC][STATISTICS][Regression] Architecture Implementation Suggestions

Hello, I have some broad general ideas about how the regression module should be structured, as outlined in my proposal briefly with UMLs This is the current implementation inside commons-math-stat-regression: This is my propsed idea, where the structure was partly inspired by SuanShu since

Re: [io] NIO2 and non-default file system support

I’ve been interested in seeing IO be updated to include support for using Path instead of just File. I can review your PR this week, though I’m certainly not the only one who can. On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 13:19, Chesney, Mark wrote: > Hello, > > Awhile back I ran into a situation where I needed