On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 17:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 28/09/2019 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:04 PM Gary Gregory
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I can confirm that if I delete all of:
> >>
> >> src\native\windows\apps\prunmgr\WINXP_X86_GUI_RELEASE
> >>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019, 16:43 Phil Steitz wrote:
> Well, I don’t have one as I don’t have a test case in hand that creates
> the condition other than my hacked version of [performance] that reliably
> reproduces it before my last commit (and doesn’t after it). I have a plane
> ride tomorrow when
Well, I don’t have one as I don’t have a test case in hand that creates the
condition other than my hacked version of [performance] that reliably
reproduces it before my last commit (and doesn’t after it). I have a plane
ride tomorrow when I can make another go at it. So let’s say give me 48
Phil (sorry for too post; phone),
May you give me an ETA so I can plan my time accordingly?
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019, 20:22 Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 5:57 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 9/25/19 6:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at
looks good with rat, japicmp, checkstyle, some warnings with javadoc.
checked with java8 and 11.
hashes and sig are fine.
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Amey
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:08 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed one important bug since Apache Commons BCEL 6.4.0 was
> released, so I
On 28/09/2019 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:04 PM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>> I can confirm that if I delete all of:
>>
>> src\native\windows\apps\prunmgr\WINXP_X86_GUI_RELEASE
>> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE
>>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:04 PM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> I can confirm that if I delete all of:
>
> src\native\windows\apps\prunmgr\WINXP_X86_GUI_RELEASE
> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE
> src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X64_EXE_RELEASE
>
> I can build without errors
I can confirm that if I delete all of:
src\native\windows\apps\prunmgr\WINXP_X86_GUI_RELEASE
src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE
src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X64_EXE_RELEASE
I can build without errors but with warnings:
.\..\..\apps\prunsrv\prunsrv.c(323): warning
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 10:03 AM sebb wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 13:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > It seems we provide too much in the src zip file like exe and obj files.
> > Also old pdb files because I get:
> >
> > .\..\..\src\cmdline.c: fatal error C1051: program database file,
> >
>
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 13:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It seems we provide too much in the src zip file like exe and obj files.
> Also old pdb files because I get:
>
> .\..\..\src\cmdline.c: fatal error C1051: program database file,
>
It seems we provide too much in the src zip file like exe and obj files.
Also old pdb files because I get:
.\..\..\src\cmdline.c: fatal error C1051: program database file,
'C:\temp\rc\commons-daemon-1.2.2-src\src\native\windows\apps\prunsrv\WINXP_X86_EXE_RELEASE\prunsrv-src.pdb',
has an obsolete
I could build the unix binaries with the directions in the project. The java
builds with 8 and 11. The signatures look correct, and all the reports look
good.
+1
@Mark - if you do more than this for validating the release could you include
it either in the project or in the [VOTE] email?
>
Hello all - could we get more votes here as we’re coming in on that 72 hour
point in the vote.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 10:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> A further regression has been identified in the 1.2.0/1.2.1 releases so
> I'd like to get 1.2.2 released to address it. So, time
13 matches
Mail list logo
