Re: [geometry] Rename Transform to AffineTransform

2020-01-07 Thread Matt Juntunen
Gilles, > I thought that the question was how to replace "transform"... I should probably clarify. I want to change the name of the Transform class to make it clear that it only represents transforms that preserve parallelism (eg, affine transforms). The most obvious name would be

Re: [geometry] Rename Transform to AffineTransform

2020-01-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 7 janv. 2020 à 17:55, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Gilles, > > > "AffineMap" (?) > > I think any name that doesn't include the word "transform" somehow would > probably be confusing. This is supposed to be a synonym.[1] I thought that the question was how to replace "transform"... > > >

Re: [geometry] Rename Transform to AffineTransform

2020-01-07 Thread Matt Juntunen
Gilles, > "AffineMap" (?) I think any name that doesn't include the word "transform" somehow would probably be confusing. > Was the same "Transform" interface used in both the "euclidean" and the "spherical" packages of "Commons Math"? Indirectly. SphericalPolygonsSet extended AbstractRegion,

Re: [geometry] Rename Transform to AffineTransform

2020-01-07 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le mar. 7 janv. 2020 à 16:00, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hi all, > > The documentation for the o.a.c.geometry.core.Transform interface (which > comes from the original commons-math version) states that implementations > must be affine. Therefore, I think we should rename this interface

[geometry] Rename Transform to AffineTransform

2020-01-07 Thread Matt Juntunen
Hi all, The documentation for the o.a.c.geometry.core.Transform interface (which comes from the original commons-math version) states that implementations must be affine. Therefore, I think we should rename this interface to AffineTransform to avoid confusion with other types of transforms,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0 based on RC1

2020-01-07 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
  [x] +1 Release these artifacts Build passing on Java 8, Ubuntu LTS. Checked dist area and maven signatures, found no issues. Nothing wrong with zip sources file as well (RELEASE-NOTES & NOTICE check OK). Thanks Bruno On Tuesday, 7 January 2020, 7:45:33 am NZDT, Gary Gregory wrote: