Both?
I’ll have to ask for a bit of guidance since it looks like DbUtils is heading
towards having an o.a.c.dbutils2 package with the 2.0 work from Bill. Should we
land 1.8 on master (currently on release branch) then move it to a 1.x branch
and replace master with the 2.0 work?
> On Jan 9,
I tested this with the following builds:
Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_144.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
This VOTE passes with the following +1 binding votes:
- Bruno P. Kinoshita
- Rob Tompkins
- Gary Gregory
No other votes were cast.
Gary
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 1:45 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a *compatibility bug* and added some minor enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS
My +1
Gary
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 1:45 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a *compatibility bug* and added some minor enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.5.0 was released, so I would like to
> release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0.
>
> Apache Commons VFS Project 2.6.0 RC1
Should this code go in master or a 1.x branch?
Gary
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020, 01:18 wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> thecarlhall pushed a commit to annotated tag 1.8-RC2
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-dbutils.git
>
>
