Re: [numbers] Complex to use code ported with a permissive licence

how about create a new project who contains the modified source function and original license，and in commons we just invoke that function？ Alex Herbert 于 2020年1月24日周五 上午8:42写道： > > > > On 24 Jan 2020, at 00:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > 2020-01-24 0:30 UTC+01:00, Alex

Re: [geometry] Beta Release

> On Jan 21, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 18:28, Rob Tompkins a écrit : >> >> >> >>> On Jan 21, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Matt Juntunen >>> wrote: >>> >>>  Do we agree that compatibility can be broken under package

[CSV] discuss 1.8 vote (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.8 based on RC1)

> On Jan 23, 2020, at 8:55 AM, sebb wrote: > > I think we don't want temporary serialisation fixes to encourage the > use of serialisation. > > So I suggest that the Release Notes and Javadoc should point out that > although serialisation is possible, it is not fully supported, and > that

Re: [numbers] Complex to use code ported with a permissive licence

> On 24 Jan 2020, at 00:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > 2020-01-24 0:30 UTC+01:00, Alex Herbert >: >> In short: >> >> - Math.hypot is required in Complex to compute sqrt(x^2 + y^2) without >> over/underflow to 1 ULP precision. >> - Complex also

Re: [numbers] Complex to use code ported with a permissive licence

Hello. 2020-01-24 0:30 UTC+01:00, Alex Herbert : > In short: > > - Math.hypot is required in Complex to compute sqrt(x^2 + y^2) without > over/underflow to 1 ULP precision. > - Complex also requires the same computation without the sqrt or > over/underflow protection > - I found the reference for

Re: [numbers] Release?

Hi. 2020-01-23 21:50 UTC+01:00, Matt Juntunen : > Hello, > >> Currently, only one unresolved issue tagged for the first release. > > I had a look at it (NUMBERS-40) and it looks like all of the changes listed > in the PR for the issue [1] are in place, The report asked for reviewing a potential

[numbers] Complex to use code ported with a permissive licence

In short: - Math.hypot is required in Complex to compute sqrt(x^2 + y^2) without over/underflow to 1 ULP precision. - Complex also requires the same computation without the sqrt or over/underflow protection - I found the reference for Math.hypot and reimplemented the function - My port is 4x

Re: Getting File of FileObject (was: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.)

class org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient interface org.apache.jackrabbit.webdav.client.methods.DavMethod log4j: Parsing for [root] with value=[DEBUG,DEBUG_LOG,ERROR_LOG]. log4j: Level token is [DEBUG]. log4j: Category root set to DEBUG log4j: Parsing appender named "DEBUG_LOG". log4j:

Re: Getting File of FileObject (was: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.)

OK> 1. I use win10, jdk 13 here. 2. make a file [D:/1 1.txt] , there is a character space between the two character '1'. 3. run a code like this. /* * MIT License * * Copyright (c) 2020 XenoAmess * * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy * of this

Re: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.

Yep,that can do... I upgrade vfs to 2.6 and tried adding commons-vfs2-jackrabbit1 and 2 and it can work correctly now. thx for your help guys. Woonsan Ko 于2020年1月24日周五 上午4:05写道： > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > > > > Likely but not exactly. > > the provider I missed im my

Re: [numbers] Release?

Hello, > Currently, only one unresolved issue tagged for the first release. I had a look at it (NUMBERS-40) and it looks like all of the changes listed in the PR for the issue [1] are in place, even though the PR was closed over 2 years ago. Is this issue still valid? Regards, Matt [1]

Re: Getting File of FileObject (was: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.)

Hello, I am not sure I understand what the actual difference is, but you are right, the URL should actually be useable. However there are a lot of inconsistencies and backward compatibilities to look out for (even File itself has different URL/URI methods and never defined how Windows drives

[collections] Bloom filter signature calculation

The HashFunctionIdentity.getSignature() method is intended to be used as in a quick comparison of a HashFunctionIdentities. As such it is supposed to encompass the name, signedness and process as well as some indication that the function implementation is the same as any other implementation of

Re: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Xeno Amess wrote: > > Likely but not exactly. > the provider I missed im my case here is > [org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.webdav.WebdavFileProvider] > and the required classes are [org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient] and >

Re: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.

Likely but not exactly. the provider I missed im my case here is [org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.webdav.WebdavFileProvider] and the required classes are [org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpClient] and [org.apache.jackrabbit.webdav.client.methods.DavMethod] I went analyze my pom. I use

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.8 based on RC1

On 23/01/2020 13:55, sebb wrote: I think we don't want temporary serialisation fixes to encourage the use of serialisation. So I suggest that the Release Notes and Javadoc should point out that although serialisation is possible, it is not fully supported, and that there are plans to drop all

Re: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 11:41 AM Xeno Amess wrote: > > yep that make sense. > but I'd rather add a class-check for provider class. > there already be a mechanism for making sure if all classes needed for > this provider class exist -> if not then just do not add the provider. > I will add a

Re: [numbers] Release?

Hi. Le jeu. 23 janv. 2020 à 15:04, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hello, > > Any chance we can get a release (beta or full) for commons-numbers? Currently, only one unresolved issue tagged for the first release.[1] Regards, Gilles [1]

[numbers] Release?

Hello, Any chance we can get a release (beta or full) for commons-numbers? As I mentioned in another thread, commons-geometry is ready for a beta release but we need commons-numbers to be released before we can do that. Regards, Matt J

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.8 based on RC1

I think we don't want temporary serialisation fixes to encourage the use of serialisation. So I suggest that the Release Notes and Javadoc should point out that although serialisation is possible, it is not fully supported, and that there are plans to drop all serialisation support. On Tue, 21

Re: Getting File of FileObject (was: some questions (/bug?) about commons-vfs2 make me confused.)

I put it in dev-list because I really donot know wether it be a bug or not. If it be a but then I'm actually willing for help. But it seems by design but not a bug here, so I apologize. Still, some questions hold. /** * Returns a URL representing this file. * * @return the URL for the file. *