Hello,
I've checked the source of https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-numbers
but didn't find support for Roman numeral conversion.
Is this in another project?
Not at all?
Planned for Numbers or another subproject like Lang, Text, or Math?
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
Hi,
Following up on modularization of apache commons maths.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1586 with
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/182.
I moved the classes from org.apache.commons.math4.legacy.util to
packages where they are used exclusively (stat,linear).
Le jeu. 27 mai 2021 à 13:53, Erik Svensson a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 2021-05-27, 11:59, "Gilles Sadowski" wrote:
>
> WARNING - External email; exercise caution.
>
> Hi.
>
> Le jeu. 27 mai 2021 à 11:32, Erik Svensson a
> écrit :
> >
> > Howdy all!
> >
> >
> >
> >
Hello.
As mentioned in another thread[1] it will be worth collecting several
maven modules under module "commons-math-legacy" (currently
in "modularized_master" branch[2]).
It is an intermediate step that focuses on severing spurious cyclic
dependencies. This refactoring is also an opportunity
On 2021-05-27, 11:59, "Gilles Sadowski" wrote:
WARNING - External email; exercise caution.
Hi.
Le jeu. 27 mai 2021 à 11:32, Erik Svensson a
écrit :
>
> Howdy all!
>
>
>
> I’m comparing FastMath with java.lang.Math and I notice that FastMath is
no
Hi.
Le jeu. 27 mai 2021 à 11:32, Erik Svensson a écrit :
>
> Howdy all!
>
>
>
> I’m comparing FastMath with java.lang.Math and I notice that FastMath is no
> longer Math-complete.
>
> Ie, jlM has methods that FastMath doesn’t have.
Incidentally, that's why the unit test suite fails when
Howdy all!
I’m comparing FastMath with java.lang.Math and I notice that FastMath is no
longer Math-complete.
Ie, jlM has methods that FastMath doesn’t have.
FM is documented as ‘drop-in replacement’ so should the new jlM methods be
added to FM?
Methods in question:
fma
