Great minds Matt, great minds... ;-)
Gary
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, 13:10 Matt Sicker wrote:
> Now that sounds like a good reason for beanutils2, too. Module splits
> to allow for minimal module dependencies is a great idea IMO, though I
> may be biased since we already started the same idea in Log
Now that sounds like a good reason for beanutils2, too. Module splits
to allow for minimal module dependencies is a great idea IMO, though I
may be biased since we already started the same idea in Log4j for 3.x
a while ago, too.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 6:55 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi All,
This is NOT about changing the Java requirement from 8 to 11.
What I am starting to think about now that Java 11 is gaining traction is
whether to split Bean Utils into modules so that it might be possible (or
not) to run BU again java.base only and have an new module that would
contain c
