Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.8 based on RC2

[x] +1 Release these artifacts Thanks Matt! -Bruno On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 15:47, Matt Juntunen wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Configuration 2.7 was released, so I would like > to release Apache Commons Configuration 2.

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.8 based on RC2

We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons Configuration 2.7 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Configuration 2.8. Apache Commons Configuration 2.8 RC2 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/com

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.8 based on RC1

Thanks, Bruno! I'm going to go ahead and cancel this vote so I can fix the README. I also noticed some inconsistency in the naming of the version. In some places I called it 2.8.0 and in others 2.8. I'm going to standardize on the shorter "2.8". RC2 should be out soon. Regards, Matt J On Tue, Jun

Re: [CRYPTO] Updated docker build

Then I was definitely looking at the wrong version of your file. I'll circle back and run it again. On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:52 PM sebb wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 22:32, Alex Remily wrote: > > > > previous > > submission.> > > > > Don't know that it's an "improvement", but a different

Re: [CRYPTO] Updated docker build

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 22:32, Alex Remily wrote: > > submission.> > > Don't know that it's an "improvement", but a different approach. I think > if we provide a dockerfile that builds every supported arch (minus the Mac) > developers could easily modify it by removing parts they don't want as >

Re: [CRYPTO] Updated docker build

Don't know that it's an "improvement", but a different approach. I think if we provide a dockerfile that builds every supported arch (minus the Mac) developers could easily modify it by removing parts they don't want as opposed to adding dependencies and builds for the parts that they do. Also,

Re: [CRYPTO] Updated docker build

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:00, Alex Remily wrote: > > I went ahead and submitted a PR related to this discussion. The dockerfile > does a full build, minus the Mac, and should simplify the release process. Not sure how it improves on the Docker build I derived from your previous submission. Did

Re: [CRYPTO] Updated docker build

I went ahead and submitted a PR related to this discussion. The dockerfile does a full build, minus the Mac, and should simplify the release process. Developers can easily modify as needed for their own purposes. I recommend removing the 32-bit Mac build profile from the POM, but have not done so

[collections] JMH results for IndexedLinkedList

Hi, Data structure: IndexedLinkedList Benchmark: IndexedLinkedListBenchmark Benchmark output: https://github.com/coderodde/indexedLinkedList/#benchmark-output >From the benchmark output, we