+1 for Gary's second option as well.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 3:47 AM Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 at 20:45, Dávid Szigecsán wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
> > thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typical
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 at 20:45, Dávid Szigecsán wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
> thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typically signifies a break
> in backward compatibility, which makes the second solution—changing the
> supertyp
