Re: Adding Commons to Sonar...

2012-06-09 Thread Brett Porter
ing? Do they set up their > own Jenkins? Or, is there one already set up that people are sharing? > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Brett Porter wrote: >> File an infra ticket tagged with that component. It needs to be added to an >> independent jenkins instance (so it doe

Re: Adding Commons to Sonar...

2012-06-09 Thread Brett Porter
) of our modules > to Sonar, how would we go about it? What would be the best approach? > Do we just add the sonar plugin to our pom.xml file? Or, do we enable > Sonar in some CI server (Jenkins does this)? I'm just trying to > understand what's involved at this point. --

Commons projects on VMBuild

2010-02-24 Thread Brett Porter
disabled? Monitoring is also failing: http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?projectId=538&projectName=&buildId=288134&projectGroupId=0 I've reconfigured the group to use Maven 2.2.1 since the parent now required it (due to a Site plugin upgrade). Thanks, Brett -- Bret

Re: What is the correct ?! - WAS Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2 did not pass ....

2009-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
-exec. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r727197 - /commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml

2008-12-16 Thread Brett Porter
+ +Fixed broken "groupId" from "org.apache.commons" to "commons-exec" + I need to read up the discussion on the earlier release, but why would you want to change that? Given that this is the first release of a component, using the newer group

Re: [Vote] Promote commons-exec to proper

2008-06-20 Thread Brett Porter
ote to MapUtil and StringUtils that they are not part of the > official API (James Carman) > +) added a status section to the main page (Rahul Alkokar) > > > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper

2008-06-18 Thread Brett Porter
1.5.0_15 2008/6/18 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Brett, > > which java version was being used so I can update the test matrix ... > > Thanks in advance > > Siegfried Goeschl > > Brett Porter wrote: >> >> My results: >> >> Ti

Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper

2008-06-13 Thread Brett Porter
;> >>> >>> ----- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> --

Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper

2008-06-13 Thread Brett Porter
-- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please disable continuum

2008-05-01 Thread Brett Porter
of > > > > notification. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that'd be good. I am in favor of continuum having such a thing ;-) > > > > > > -Rahul > > > > > > > > > > - > To un

Re: Please disable continuum

2008-04-30 Thread Brett Porter
; of > > notification. > > > > > Yes, that'd be good. I am in favor of continuum having such a thing ;-) > > -Rahul > > > > > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > > > --------

Re: Problems with Continuum VMBuild Server

2008-04-25 Thread Brett Porter
2008/4/25 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Brett, > > probably a stupid question no such thing :) > - how do I do that? > Go to the project page: http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectView.action?projectId=178 Click "add" a build definition. The best combination would be the "n

Re: Problems with Continuum VMBuild Server

2008-04-25 Thread Brett Porter
. > > > Command output: > --- > > > svn: Working copy '.' locked > > > svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for > details) > > > Ty

Re: [all] releasing a nearly dormant project (was Re: [exec] how to proceed for a nearly dormant project)

2008-01-03 Thread Brett Porter
here - but > stating an intention to stick around and look after it when proposing > promotion would make me more likely to vote for it (plus yours and > Luc's semi-interest helps). Looking at the commit logs, the people to > last work on actual code

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Configuration

2007-08-31 Thread Brett Porter
I just had to install it - it's not running. On 01/09/2007, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, we're using xvfb? > > On 8/31/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yep, there was a couple more libraries it needed - it's all workin

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Configuration

2007-08-31 Thread Brett Porter
linux > box? That usually fixes my builds/servers when they need a graphics > environment, because it tricks the operating system into thinking > there is one. > > On 8/31/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, we're building with: >

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Configuration

2007-08-31 Thread Brett Porter
why it's not working yet. - Brett On 31/08/2007, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote on Friday, August 31, 2007 9:00 AM: > > > Brett Porter wrote on Friday, August 31, 2007 2:54 AM: > > > >> It actually works under Java 5 or Java 6 -

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Configuration

2007-08-30 Thread Brett Porter
ubleArray( > >> org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration) > >>> testGetDoubleList( > >> org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration) > >>> testGetBigIntegerArray( > >> org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataC

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Configuration

2007-08-28 Thread Brett Porter
define for surefire the awt.headless system property. > > > > [snip] > > > > - Jörg > > > > ----- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?

2007-08-26 Thread Brett Porter
On 26/08/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given that, isn't Gump producing something closer to what we want for > > nightly builds than Continuum? Why not use the Gump output for the > > nightlies? > > On the other hand, why produce a new nightly if nothing's changed? Yah, Continuum

Re: [all] CI status

2007-08-24 Thread Brett Porter
t be due to a missing dependency > to javax mail, which I added only recently to the m2 build. > > Oliver > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: FileUpload

2007-08-23 Thread Brett Porter
------- > > [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch > > [INFO] > > > > [INFO] Total time: 15 seconds > > [INFO] Finished at: Wed Aug 22 05:57:36 PDT 2007 > > [INFO] Final Memory: 6M/15M > > [INFO] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [nightly build] Moving to Continuum...

2007-08-21 Thread Brett Porter
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ --

Re: Commons Math, Commons Nightlies, vmbuild

2007-08-13 Thread Brett Porter
cheers > -- > Torsten > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Commons Math, Commons Nightlies, vmbuild

2007-07-31 Thread Brett Porter
On 14/07/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let's test it once it's up, then decide whether to use that, or move > > the script over. What would be the best set of projects to pilot with > > (the ones that cover all cases)? > > Lets start with [math] and [dbcp], which now have working m