I would prefer all Commons projects using the same style :-) sorry can't
help to making some noise :-)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Chen, Haifeng
wrote:
> Mixed whitespace styles should be definitely avoided in anyway.
> Do we have to change 2 spaces indent to 4
Just curious, how did this pass the staging test during the vote?
Thanks
-D
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I burned the time I had last night trying to figure out what was going on
before I saw Grygorz' explanation and I have been out of pocket
see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-438
I have the changes at https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/vfs-1.0/vfs-smb
for reference only, it does not get pushed to Maven Central
-D
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Israel,
The sandbox is not
should it be 1.0.1? since it is just for bug fixes
Thanks
-D
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I am thinking about releasing 1.1 now that we have a small batch of
changes.
We can continue to 1.1.1 or 1.2 with the issue currently active in Jira.
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Maven-Parent-POM-24-Maven-Plugins-Parent-POM-25-Maven-Shared-Components-Parent-POM-20-M9-td5789803.html
-D
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
2014-10-20 15:31 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com:
is it a typo for 'stagin' at URL??
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
IIRC, I've seen this before when the group ID does not exist in Nexus. So
you have to ask infra for help.
Gary
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Emmanuel Bourg
to maintain the CIFS
code and leave no dilemma.
On 24/05/2014 16:19, sebb wrote:
On 23 May 2014 17:59, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we just need to promote vfs-cifs and mark jcifs optional. That
complies with Apache's policy
ASF policy requires that downstream consumers
As a user cutting my own internal bld +1
On Thursday, May 1, 2014, Gabriel Reid gabriel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is currently a specific plan or list of
requirements to be fulfilled before the 1.0 of commons-csv is made.
For me personally, as well as (I
API breakage would be 2.0. Do we know yet that fixing those issue would
send use to 2.0?
Thanks
-D
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
The question is would fixing these two issues break compatibility? We have
three compatibility levels: binary,
Please please release it :-)
Thanks
-D
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:46 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the references to the text file in the NOTICE file don't belong
there.
It's vital that the NOTICE file only contain required attributions.
I think we can put the references in the
Please promote smb module if jcifs (LPGL) as optional dependency, i have
been using its snapshot for a couple of years
-Dan
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, a release would be good. It's been too long.
I think it's just a matter (for me and
since JCIFS is used as optional dependency, isn't it sufficient? here is
the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-438
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
Please promote smb
VFS has no release for a couple of years. Would you consider it as proper?
-D
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I think Phil came up with the idea to try to focus on the components that
we are able to maintain and put all other stuff to dormant.
I am a active VFS user wishing to have an official VFS 2.1 release :-)
Sorry about the noise.
-Dan
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
wrote:
Dan Tran wrote:
VFS has no release
is this vote dead?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote:
OK... I don't need my abacus to count votes and see that this failed.
I'll work on the things folks mentioned and try for another release
this weekend.
Thanks again for all of the help/feedback!
Hello
The Mojo team is pleased to announce the release of VFS Maven Plugin 1.0 Beta 1
This plugin is a wrapper of Apache's Commons Virtual File System ( VFS )
To use this plugin, specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId
at 3:02 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont know if there is any read only public server.
Can you just roll in cifs provider into the trunk for 2.1? I will be
your first beta customer ( even thou we are already perform intensive
test in house )
-D
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM
perhaps, we can release smb provider as is at commons-vfs and mark it
as experimental? I see a number of apache project doing that.
-D
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I took a closer look at writing unit test case for vfs-cifs and came
Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
perhaps, we can release smb provider as is at commons-vfs and mark it
as experimental? I see a number of apache project doing that.
-D
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I took a closer look at writing unit test case
Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:49 AM
Subject: Re: Promote vfs-cift out of sandbox?
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
I have from now to Octorber to either:
1. Implement test
I have from now to Octorber to either:
1. Implement test requirement to graduate vfs-cifs out of sandbox at
Apache common
2. Release it as a alpha/beta at Codehaus together with vfs-maven-plugin
3. Release to our internal repo.
The prefer one is 1
What is VFS 2.1 schedule?
Thanks
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:05, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
Questions:
1. So that i can plan out our own release, what is the 'potential'
time frame we may see another release of VFS?
Any time. Rolling a release takes anywhere from a week or a couple of
weeks depending
if there is a server we can embed in our tests out there.
This is why I started my message with Ideally.
Gary
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
I am confuse here, you are asking me to embed a cifs server ( which
have not found a java implementation yet
Hi,
I have a forked a copy of vfs-cift to codehaus [1] to test it out. It
works so far for me.
What would it take to promote the current VFS's CIFT out of sandbox to
be released with VFS-2.x?
Thanks
-Dan
[1] https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/vfs/vfs-smb/
dynamic imports?
No, VFS is on the Bundle-ClassPath.
And VFS and other jars in is our app server jar.
Gary
Gary
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for discover
running single test with 2.12 is broken on Windows , and no fix
available either.
Dont have the JIRA number with me thou.
-Dan
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Ralph Goers
ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
What?
Thanks for discover this issue. Look likes FileProvider get excluded
from export list?
-D
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
The classLoader ivar is initialized differently in 1.0 than in 2.0.
That's why the CCE shows up. A different class loader is
27 matches
Mail list logo