I have also used gitk
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:24 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> SourceTree is also very nice
>
> https://www.sourcetreeapp.com
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:12 PM James Carman
> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried using your IDE?
> >
Are we going to reimplement the whole Java 8 Streams?
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
today, I have committed a first version of a FluentIterable
(COLLECTIONS-464).
Example usage:
ListString result =
FluentIterable
.of(1, 2,
Maybe nobody is interested to upgrade the Java version if they are not
forced to. If nobody force them, then CM will have to support Java 6 even
for 5.0 release. The sooner we drop support for older version, the better.
I'd say that current and current - 1 versions(i.e. 7 and 8) are more than
I think Rebel Labs or Plumbr have some metrics about JDK usage.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Hank Grabowski h...@applieddefense.com
wrote:
Java 8 has only been out for less than a year. There is still a sizable
percentage of groups that have not converted up to Java 8 for myriad
My clients started to use Java 7 a few months before, so I wouldn't choose
Java 8. I know it's new and shinny and as a developer I'd love to play with
it, but unfortunately, users are using it. I'd go for Java 7 and plan Java
8 for Math 5.0
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Benedikt Ritter
Java 6 reached EOF. I have recently switched from 6 to 7 in a personal
project because I really wanted to try the new features, like
try-with-resources. The transition was a walk in the park. I think that you
should go for Java 7. It is time to move on and leave behind the legacy
versions.
On
This is the killer feature for Git, because many of us, the newcomers, like
me, will want to experiment a little before submitting a patch. This way, I
can create a local branch and I'm free to do whatever I want. The SVN
branch is visible on the server, I don't want to publish my crappy code