I think, that Gilles is right in pointing out, that the current policy
(accept patches only with explicit, or implicit, acceptance of
contribution under the ASL) clashes somehow with Github PR's in that
it is difficult to assume implicit acceptance in that cases.
However, I don't think that this q
You could add a PR template to github, and put a big banner in there that
says something like that.
On May 2, 2019 at 11:54:34, Eric Barnhill (ericbarnh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I am happy to review PRs and approve merges as well, it's become part of my
daily routine at work to use GitHub in this wa
I am happy to review PRs and approve merges as well, it's become part of my
daily routine at work to use GitHub in this way, so it's no trouble.
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:56 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Some people are providing PRs[1] on GitHub without engaging with
> us, here, or on JIRA
Thank you Bruno and Alex!
Best,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi Gilles,
I saw the PR for Statistics and noted that it was a trivial change that
may not be warranted, or at least not in the form provided. I'll make
more time to watch PRs for those projects you mentioned.
Alex
On 02/05/2019 12:32, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
Commented on the two PRs li
Commented on the two PRs linked here. I am almost through the
commons-imaging-1.0-alpha1 release (finally!). After that I will finally be
able to use more development time to run through components with pending PR's
and issues, and try to reply to some of these contributors.
Thanks Gilles!
Brun
Hi.
Some people are providing PRs[1] on GitHub without engaging with
us, here, or on JIRA.
When this happens for codes[2] which I'm the assumed reviewer,[3]
I'd need help from someone, with a GitHub account, who would post
a comment there, in order to let the "outside" contributors know that
we wo