In git master: Annotated Converter with @FunctionalInterface.
Gary
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:12 AM Claude Warren wrote:
>
> I am looking at BeanUtils as part of the CLI options to parse a command
> line option string into a class.
>
> I see that Converter is an interface with one method; convert
Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-564
Gary
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 7:02 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Also:
>
> - BeanIntrospector
> - LocaleConverter
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 6:56 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > No reason aside from the fact that the code base is not
Also:
- BeanIntrospector
- LocaleConverter
Gary
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 6:56 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> No reason aside from the fact that the code base is not fully
> modernized. You could also ask if Converter should extend BiFunction.
>
> I would like to create a release candidate for a 2.0.
No reason aside from the fact that the code base is not fully
modernized. You could also ask if Converter should extend BiFunction.
I would like to create a release candidate for a 2.0.0-M1 release
soon. This would unlock a lot of other work down the line.
One item holding us back is that BeanUti
The 1.9.x releases are pre-JDK 8. The project looks set up for a 2.0
release where such a change might make sense but I don't think that
has happened yet.
Cheers, Paul.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 6:12 PM Claude Warren wrote:
>
> I am looking at BeanUtils as part of the CLI options to parse a comman
I am looking at BeanUtils as part of the CLI options to parse a command
line option string into a class.
I see that Converter is an interface with one method; converting a String
to an Object. Is there a good reason for this not to be annotated as
an @FunctionalInterface?
Claude
--
LinkedIn: ht
