On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/19/2010 06:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > prunsrv //? includes
> > > >
> > > > --LogJniMessages
> > > >
> > > > which is not documented anywhere as far as I can
On 03/19/2010 06:10 PM, sebb wrote:
On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote:
prunsrv //? includes
--LogJniMessages
which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell.
The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I
have no idea.
Anyon
On 19/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > prunsrv //? includes
> >
> > --LogJniMessages
> >
> > which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell.
> >
> > The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I
> > have no idea.
> >
> > Anyone
On 03/19/2010 05:51 PM, sebb wrote:
prunsrv //? includes
--LogJniMessages
which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell.
The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I
have no idea.
Anyone know so I can update the docs?
Sure. I added this recently.
It is for
prunsrv //? includes
--LogJniMessages
which is not documented anywhere as far as I can tell.
The parameter takes a numeric value, but what the value is used for, I
have no idea.
Anyone know so I can update the docs?
-
To unsub
On 19/03/2010, Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> --
> From: "sebb"
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:18 PM
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Subject: Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation
>
>
> >
--
From: "sebb"
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:18 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [DAEMON] Procrun documentation
On 18/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/18/2010 08:13 PM, sebb wrote:
> As people may
On 18/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 08:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > As people may have noticed, I've been trying to update the procrun
> > documentation.
> >
> >
>
> Cool, thanks.
> But that doesn't mean you are free to delay the
> release forever :)
> Let's push the 1.0.3 out and wo
On 03/18/2010 08:13 PM, sebb wrote:
As people may have noticed, I've been trying to update the procrun
documentation.
Cool, thanks.
But that doesn't mean you are free to delay the
release forever :)
Let's push the 1.0.3 out and work on improvements.
There are a few details that need clarifyi
As people may have noticed, I've been trying to update the procrun
documentation.
There are a few details that need clarifying:
- the Start/Stop mode can be jvm, Java or exe. What do these each do?
- how should a Java application be structured? I originally thought it
was the same as for jsvc, bu
10 matches
Mail list logo
