Just committed the updated version, I hope I didn't break anything...
I'm following the ML to see Gump messages...
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wro
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
> thanks for your help! I'm not a commons committer and haven't checked
> yet if my apache id is enabled to login into Gump (but I don't think
> it does)
Any Apache committer can edit Gump metadata, search here [1] for digester.
Hi Sebb,
thanks for your help! I'm not a commons committer and haven't checked
yet if my apache id is enabled to login into Gump (but I don't think
it does)
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 2
On 24 August 2010 08:12, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> I had a look at the ant build that Gump executes, the 'test' target
> doesn't ignore abstract test case, adding the following lines:
>
>
>
>
> In the 'test' taget fixes the broken build. Hope this helps!
Since the non-Gump build
I had a look at the ant build that Gump executes, the 'test' target
doesn't ignore abstract test case, adding the following lines:
In the 'test' taget fixes the broken build. Hope this helps!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Au
Hi Rahul,
sorry for the silly question, but reading the following message:
[...]
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:906)
[junit] at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:906)
[junit] Ru
ouch!!! :) I'm looking into it NOW!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> just checked out the digester /trunk and run tests, everyt
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> just checked out the digester /trunk and run tests, everything worked
> fine. All new stuff are contained in the current development code.
> I really appreciate you fixed the inglorious compiler problem, there
> are no words to s
Hi Rahul,
just checked out the digester /trunk and run tests, everything worked
fine. All new stuff are contained in the current development code.
I really appreciate you fixed the inglorious compiler problem, there
are no words to say thank you for saving me a lot of work :P
At that point I'd cons
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Thanks for your help, I'll install a Win machine and fix it!
I had a chance to look at the code. I've checked in a fix to humor my
compiler, and merged the at-digester functionality into the digester
trunk.
Please take a look at the dige
Thanks for your help, I'll install a Win machine and fix it!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi!!!
>> really wired, we're using the same mav
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi!!!
> really wired, we're using the same maven version, the main differences
> I notice are
> - OS (win xp Vs mac os x)
> - platform encoding
> - Java version (1.5.0_17 Vs 1.5.0_24)
>
> I think the first 2 points could be ignored, I don't
Hi!!!
really wired, we're using the same maven version, the main differences
I notice are
- OS (win xp Vs mac os x)
- platform encoding
- Java version (1.5.0_17 Vs 1.5.0_24)
I think the first 2 points could be ignored, I don't know if the java
version can imply something... I don't understand why
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Just installed the Java5, ran 'mvn test' and worked... , follows below
> my terminal output (omitted all the tests)... can you tell me please
> what goes wrong?
Ofcourse, see details below.
-Rahul
java -version
java version "1.5.0_17"
Just installed the Java5, ran 'mvn test' and worked... , follows below
my terminal output (omitted all the tests)... can you tell me please
what goes wrong?
I'm testing it with the JavaForMacOSX10.5Update7 package.
Thanks in advance!!!
Simo
Simones-Computer-2:commons-digester simone$ echo $JAVA_HO
Hi Rahul,
thanks for your feedbacks!!! Your understanding in a) can be
confirmed, the original digester codebase has not been modified at
all, just added the 'annotations' package.
Apologizes for b) can you tell me please what's wrong? Unfortunately
right now on my mac I only have the default Java6
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Thanks a lot! :) Feel free to contact me whenever you need for clarifications.
I just took a quick look and have two comments:
(a) Being in sync with trunk - There are a large number of small
differences between the trunk and the sandbox
Thanks a lot! :) Feel free to contact me whenever you need for clarifications.
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> th
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> this mail just as a reminder since you told me there was no problem at
> all on ping you :) Can we plan in a short-therm a review on this?
Yes, thats no problem at all, sometimes even necessary. I will try to
get to this within
Hi Rahul,
this mail just as a reminder since you told me there was no problem at
all on ping you :) Can we plan in a short-therm a review on this?
Thanks in advance, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Simone Tri
ok thanks, please don't forget me :P ;)
have anice conference,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> any news on this?
>
>
> No
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> any news on this?
None from me, plus I am at a conference next week. It is still on my
list, however!
-Rahul
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:
Hi all guys,
any news on this?
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> thanks a lot, very appreciated :)
> Have a nice WE, greetings,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://w
Hi Rahul,
thanks a lot, very appreciated :)
Have a nice WE, greetings,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> as discussed and agre
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> as discussed and agreed with Rahul[1] last week, I added the missing -
> hopefully, detailed - package documentation on the "annotations"
> package on the sandbox digester[2] and merged latest trunk
> modifications, re-execute
Hi all guys,
as discussed and agreed with Rahul[1] last week, I added the missing -
hopefully, detailed - package documentation on the "annotations"
package on the sandbox digester[2] and merged latest trunk
modifications, re-executed tests that still pass.
Now I'd ask your help/feedbacks/suggestio
26 matches
Mail list logo
