At some point in the future we will have a 2.0 and that's when to revist
this issue. Feel free to create a Jira ticket to request this as a feature
for a future 2.0.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, 7:47 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Personal opinion: it probably wasn't intentional, but please d
Personal opinion: it probably wasn't intentional, but please don't do
that. It doesn't help anyone and is needless churn. Fluent methods are
not better than non-fluent ones, and are in fact less semantic and
harder to debug. They prioritize saving code writing over code
maintainability.
Not just p
I think the natural next question is whether we can have a major version
change?
Mike
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 6:24 AM sebb wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 12:13, Filip Strajnar
> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> >
> > I've noticed that some methods on the org.apache.commons.mail.Email
> > clas
On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 12:13, Filip Strajnar wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
>
> I've noticed that some methods on the org.apache.commons.mail.Email
> class provide fluent interface (examples include setCc, addBcc,
> addReplyTo), and some do not (to name a few: setAuthentication,
> setSmtpPort, setMailSe
Greetings,
I've noticed that some methods on the org.apache.commons.mail.Email
class provide fluent interface (examples include setCc, addBcc,
addReplyTo), and some do not (to name a few: setAuthentication,
setSmtpPort, setMailSession). Is this intentional, or am I allowed to
submit a PR tha
