On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:23:34 +, sebb wrote:
On 18 December 2016 at 07:04, Duncan Jones
wrote:
On 18 Dec 2016, at 06:55, Gary Gregory
wrote:
I thought we were talking about deprecating any random code in
favor of
Commons RNG?
Gary
I guess that depends on the scope of RNG. Our previ
+1 to moving this to Text. New code goes in Text. Old code is deprecated
and copied.
Gary
On Dec 18, 2016 5:05 AM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2016, at 6:10 AM, Pascal Schumacher
> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 18.12.2016 um 11:57 schrieb Duncan Jones:
> >>
> >>> On 18 Dec 2016, at 10:51, se
> On Dec 18, 2016, at 6:10 AM, Pascal Schumacher
> wrote:
>
>> Am 18.12.2016 um 11:57 schrieb Duncan Jones:
>>
>>> On 18 Dec 2016, at 10:51, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 December 2016 at 10:40, Pascal Schumacher
>>> wrote:
> Am 18.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb sebb:
> It's definitely too s
Am 18.12.2016 um 11:57 schrieb Duncan Jones:
On 18 Dec 2016, at 10:51, sebb wrote:
On 18 December 2016 at 10:40, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
Am 18.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb sebb:
It's definitely too specialised for LANG.
I do not think this is too specialized for LANG. RandomStringUtils has b
> On 18 Dec 2016, at 10:51, sebb wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2016 at 10:40, Pascal Schumacher
> wrote:
>> Am 18.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb sebb:
>>>
>>> It's definitely too specialised for LANG.
>>
>> I do not think this is too specialized for LANG. RandomStringUtils has been
>> part of LANG sinc
On 18 December 2016 at 10:40, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> Am 18.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb sebb:
>>
>> It's definitely too specialised for LANG.
>
> I do not think this is too specialized for LANG. RandomStringUtils has been
> part of LANG since 1.0, and this is just an improved version of existing
>
Am 18.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb sebb:
It's definitely too specialised for LANG.
I do not think this is too specialized for LANG. RandomStringUtils has
been part of LANG since 1.0, and this is just an improved version of
existing functionality.
-
On 18 December 2016 at 07:04, Duncan Jones wrote:
>
>> On 18 Dec 2016, at 06:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> I thought we were talking about deprecating any random code in favor of
>> Commons RNG?
>>
>> Gary
>
> I guess that depends on the scope of RNG. Our previous conversation about
> RandomUtil
> On 18 Dec 2016, at 06:55, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I thought we were talking about deprecating any random code in favor of
> Commons RNG?
>
> Gary
I guess that depends on the scope of RNG. Our previous conversation about
RandomUtils made sense (LANG-1299), since that was about the functional
