Re: [Lang] CheckedFunction#unchecked

Please do! This is a pretty common need and it would be nice to present a really well-designed set of types for it. ajs6f > On Nov 29, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Aleksander Ściborek > wrote: > > Ok, so I'm going to continue snd in the near future I will create pull > request with a lot of checked fun

Re: [Lang] CheckedFunction#unchecked

Ok, so I'm going to continue snd in the near future I will create pull request with a lot of checked functions like Consumer, Predicate BinaryFuncton etc. On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 15:01 ajs6f In that case you might want to also look at some other choices people have > made like > > https://github.c

Re: [Lang] CheckedFunction#unchecked

In that case you might want to also look at some other choices people have made like https://github.com/google/mug#maybe or even more specialized facilities like https://github.com/google/chkstream I'm not against plain general functional types that handle checked exceptions (I imagine most o

Re: [Lang] CheckedFunction#unchecked

Of course you are right. I'm going to add new functions. The idea behind this pull request is to show what I want to create, that's why I marked PR as WIP (Work in Progress) On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 14:31 ajs6f I would rather see a more complete offering with the other types in > j.u.function, i.e.

Re: [Lang] CheckedFunction#unchecked

I would rather see a more complete offering with the other types in j.u.function, i.e. Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, the various primitive-specialized types... ajs6f > On Nov 24, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Pascal Schumacher > wrote: > > Hi Aleksander, > > thanks. > > Imho this would be a useful ad

Re: [Lang] CheckedFunction#unchecked

Hi Aleksander, thanks. Imho this would be a useful addition to commons-lang. Any other opinions? Cheers, Pascal Am 21.11.2018 um 22:52 schrieb Aleksander Ściborek: Hi I've just created pull request for CheeckedFunction interface. This is an e