RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:37 > > Did some cleanup in JIRA > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958 OGNL-238, unless I am misreading it, is asking for capabilities that do not exist in Java since the infor

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:40 > > 2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter : > >> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the > >> > > > >> > > "package ognl;" > >> > > > >> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use > >> > > > >> > > "p

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter : >> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the >> > > >> > > "package ognl;" >> > > >> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use >> > > >> > > "package org.apache.commons.ognl;" >> > > >> > > I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package >> > spa

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Did some cleanup in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958 2013/12/30 Lukasz Lenart : > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : >> There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache >> svn. >> I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to s

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:05 > > 2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: sebb > > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > > > > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > >> -Orig

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron > > -Original Message- > > From: sebb > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Benedikt Ritter > > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > > >> > > >> Hello J

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: sebb > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Benedikt Ritter > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > >> > >> Hello Jason, > >> > >> sorry, I don't understand wh

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread sebb
On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Benedikt Ritter >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 >> >> Hello Jason, >> >> sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can >> you give some examples? > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > > Hello Jason, > > sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can > you give some examples? The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the "package ognl;" declarations, where as the apache re

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can you give some examples? Benedikt 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lukasz Lenart > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 > > > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > > > There are a lot of form

Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > > There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version > in git and apache svn. > > I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to > subversion, > > do y

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache > svn. > I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to subversion, do you > know of any? All should be already applied or don't affect Apache's version Regards -- Łukasz + 48 60

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
there > >> > any plans on a release? > >> > > >> > Either way, please commit the patch on > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/OGNL-240 > >> > > >> > Is there something I can do for the project? > >> >

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
tember. >> Are there >> > any plans on a release? >> > >> > Either way, please commit the patch on >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/OGNL-240 >> > >> > Is there something I can do for the project? >> > >> >

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-26 Thread Henri Yandell
> any plans on a release? > > > > > > Either way, please commit the patch on > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/OGNL-240 > > > > > > Is there something I can do for the project? > > > > > > -Jason > > > > > >&

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-25 Thread Jason Pyeron
gt; >> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com > >> [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi > >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 > >> To: Commons Developers List > >> Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release > >> > >> You

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Is there something I can do for the project? > > -Jason > >> -Original Message- >> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com >> [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 >> To: Commons Developers List >>

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-24 Thread Jason Pyeron
il.com > [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release > > Your are welcome, Javin! > > have a nice day, all the best, > -Simo > > http://p

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Your are welcome, Javin! have a nice day, all the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Javin Paul wrote: > Thanks Simo, that's very neat. > > On Wed, M

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-28 Thread Javin Paul
Thanks Simo, that's very neat. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? > > > > Sure, we track resolved issues with fix version: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313525&version=12323958 >

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
> Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? > Sure, we track resolved issues with fix version: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313525&version=12323958 HTH! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twi

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-27 Thread Javin Paul
Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > I have removed @Deprecated methods, tomorrow will review all the > TODOs. After that we can start planning the release. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.p

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-27 Thread Lukasz Lenart
I have removed @Deprecated methods, tomorrow will review all the TODOs. After that we can start planning the release. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@common

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
FYI I've just started a new thread (http://goo.gl/cx1E5) on Struts dev list Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=mau

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara : > Do you mean this [1] isEvalChain method? > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/SimpleNode.java IDEA cheats me ;-) It used wrong version ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Do you mean this [1] isEvalChain method? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/SimpleNode.java On 26 March 2013 10:12, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > isEvalChain() method isn't available in OGNL 4 Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cuc

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it > easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to > integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right > place, or at least the only place

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara : > I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it > easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to > integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right > place, or at least the only place, where this discussion should

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right place, or at least the only place, where this discussion should happen) Twitter :http://www.twitt

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier : >> +1, go for it. >> Now its time to see if our testcases are good. > > They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-) > >> I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts. > > Not so eas

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier : > +1, go for it. > Now its time to see if our testcases are good. They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-) > I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts. Not so easy, OGNL 4 is a different beast, but I'll try ;-) Regards -- Łuka

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1, go for it. Now its time to see if our testcases are good. I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register > an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better.

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-232 2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart : > Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register > an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better... > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > 2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better... Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart : > I'm not sure what API should be removed/renamed/etc as almost > everything is public s

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
I'm not sure what API should be removed/renamed/etc as almost everything is public static ;-) Anyway, I'm trying to remove two deprecated classes right now. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/3/8 Christian Grobmeier : > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb wrot

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb wrote: > On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new >> version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe >> "These nested if statements could be combined" shoul

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-06 Thread sebb
On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Hi, > > I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new > version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe > "These nested if statements could be combined" should be resolved, but > the rest I don't see a point ins

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe "These nested if statements could be combined" should be resolved, but the rest I don't see a point instead of just satisfying PMD itself. Some of the Findbug

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy : > to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in > target/site/) > to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. > and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I > can. I just moved site-content into target/ folder and that solved the

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in target/site/) to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I can. 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart : > 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart : >> How can I update ognl website? Simple checkou

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart : > How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I > need? and then what to do? I found this [1], but I have one question, how to check locally how the site will look like before deploying it? I have the only solution: mvn clean site copy target/site i

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-28 Thread Lukasz Lenart
How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I need? and then what to do? eg. RAT report is broken as it includes all the html files [2] [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-ognl/ [2] http://commons.apache.org/proper/comm

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27 February 2013 11:19, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Olivier is right: No Release No download link. I think there should still be a download page, which says that there is no release yet. Otherwise one cannot be sure whether the page (and link) are missing by mistake - as is clear from this th

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Olivier is right: No Release No download link. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara Maurizio Cuc

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
to download what ? AFAIK there are no release of Ognl @apache. Will be restored with the first release. 2013/2/27 Lukasz Lenart : > Why the Download section is commented out in the site.xml ? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-231 > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://w

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Why the Download section is commented out in the site.xml ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-231 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.o

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Lukasz Lenart : >> AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub >> requirement for the site and 28 is not ready yet, waiting for INFRA. See >> vote thread for commons-email. > > Thanks Jörg! Looks like something changed as ognl build passed on Jenkins ;-) Regar

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-08 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Jörg Schaible : > Hi Lukasz, > > Lukasz Lenart wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, >> should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? > > AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub > requirement for

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Lukasz, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Hi, > > Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, > should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub requirement for the site and 28 is not ready yet, wait

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> Do you know how to exclude some files/directories from the rat-plugin > scan ? Right now it includes .idea folder in the scan which produces > mass of errors :\ have not tried yet, but it supports an "exclude" option in the configuration: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Christian Grobmeier : > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, >> should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? > > Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot > release a

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, > should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot release a stable version with a dependency to a -S

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-28 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
IIRC you should just run mvn site:run Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity. Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 28/ott/2012 11.24, "Lukasz Lenart" ha scritto: > How to generate reports locally ? > > > Thanks in advance > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-28 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Use the mvn site goal. Benedikt Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 28.10.2012 um 11:24 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > How to generate reports locally ? > > > Thanks in advance > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-28 Thread Lukasz Lenart
How to generate reports locally ? Thanks in advance -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2012/10/24 Maurizio Cucchiara : > That's really weird, last time I have seen (and also corrected) a bunch of > error like this, but they all were more than justified. > > I'll try to generate the report and see what happens. Maybe the website is out of sync ? How to deploy a new version ? Regard

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-24 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
That's really weird, last time I have seen (and also corrected) a bunch of error like this, but they all were more than justified. I'll try to generate the report and see what happens. Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity. Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 24/ott/2012 08.19,

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-23 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2012/3/9 Simone Tripodi : > I don't think it is necessary when fixing this kind of issues, unless > you need to heavily change the code, but I don't suspect so ;) > let me know if I can be helpful in some way - more than just helping > on fixing issues :P I have few doubts regarding checkstyle rep

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
I don't think it is necessary when fixing this kind of issues, unless you need to heavily change the code, but I don't suspect so ;) let me know if I can be helpful in some way - more than just helping on fixing issues :P best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.l

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-03-09 Thread Łukasz Lenart
2012/3/9 Simone Tripodi : > Hi Lukasz, > > I am worried that current number of detected > PMD/CPD/findbugs/checkstyle/& co.[1] is too under the quality here at > commons  are used to, before releasing a component. > It would be great having them fixed before releasing, then I can > quickly cut a ne

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Lukasz, I am worried that current number of detected PMD/CPD/findbugs/checkstyle/& co.[1] is too under the quality here at commons are used to, before releasing a component. It would be great having them fixed before releasing, then I can quickly cut a new RC (I am now used to cover the releas

[OGNL] A new release

2012-03-09 Thread Łukasz Lenart
Hi, Any plans to make a new release ? I'd like to help, could you point me in the right direction ? Is there any guideline how to do it ? Kind regards -- Łukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ mobile +48 606 323 122, office +27 11 0838747 Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/