JSONLD-Java switched to JsonLd, after originally using uppercased
versions, to match the terminology casing used by the final
JSON-LD-API-1.0 specification:
https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/#the-application-programming-interface
The capitalisation in the project name is just kept for posterity a
On 13 Sep 2016 2:15 a.m., "Gary Gregory" wrote:
>
> For names, I like CamelCaseEvenForAcronyms, like IbmXmlSaxParser instead
of
> IBMXMLSAXParser.
As well :-)
And I am not sure which class or package prefix to use for JSONLD-Java..
JsonLd is what is used within its classes. And RDF4J is their of
Hi,
For names, I like CamelCaseEvenForAcronyms, like IbmXmlSaxParser instead of
IBMXMLSAXParser.
Gary
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> [[ I've copied both lists, prefer replies to dev@commons.apache.org ]]
>
> What style should we use for packages and class names f
[[ I've copied both lists, prefer replies to dev@commons.apache.org ]]
What style should we use for packages and class names for the Commons
RDF Term implementations?
To give an example:
http://stain.github.io/incubator-commonsrdf/integration/org/apache/commons/rdf/api/IRI.html
(org.apache.com
