Re: [VFS] 2.0 update to Java 1.5 - generics etc?

On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:15 PM, sebb wrote: > If we do require a minimum of Java 1.5 for VFS 2.0, we probably also > need to ensure that the code compiles without warnings on Java 1.5. > > This would mean adding @Override etc. annotations and generics. > > Thoughts? > While that would be a good

Re: [VFS] 2.0 update to Java 1.5 - generics etc?

On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:16, "sebb" wrote: > If we do require a minimum of Java 1.5 for VFS 2.0, we probably also > need to ensure that the code compiles without warnings on Java 1.5. > > This would mean adding @Override etc. annotations and generics. > > Thoughts? +1 but not a blocker Gary > >

[VFS] 2.0 update to Java 1.5 - generics etc?

If we do require a minimum of Java 1.5 for VFS 2.0, we probably also need to ensure that the code compiles without warnings on Java 1.5. This would mean adding @Override etc. annotations and generics. Thoughts? - To unsubscribe,