ose tests should be behind a capability for sure, but I thought they
> are
> > already (as the resource and URL fikesystem already passes the tests).
> >
> > What filesystem do you have in mind and what are examples of failing
> > testcases? I think I had fixed a few for WebDav
Bernd Eckenfels (e...@zusammenkunft.net)
> wrote:
>
> Those tests should be behind a capability for sure, but I thought they
are
> already (as the resource and URL fikesystem already passes the tests).
>
> What filesystem do you have in mind and what are examples of failing
> tes
wrote:
>
> Those tests should be behind a capability for sure, but I thought they are
> already (as the resource and URL fikesystem already passes the tests).
>
> What filesystem do you have in mind and what are examples of failing
> testcases? I think I had fixed a few for WebDav
urce and URL fikesystem already passes the tests).
What filesystem do you have in mind and what are examples of failing
testcases? I think I had fixed a few for WebDav back in the days.
Gruss
Bernd
Von: Otto Fowler
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 13:41
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: [VFS] FI
Otto Fowler
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 13:41
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests
If you have a filesystem, where everything could be a FILE_OR_FOLDER type (
or VIRTUAL until attached ), then it seems like you need to replace some of
the testcases in
think I had fixed a few for WebDav back in the days.
Gruss
Bernd
Von: Otto Fowler
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 13:41
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests
If you have a filesystem, where everything could be a FILE_OR_FOLDER type (
or VIRTUAL un
Von: Otto Fowler
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 13:41
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests
If you have a filesystem, where everything could be a FILE_OR_FOLDER type (
or VIRTUAL until attached ), then it seems like you need to replace some of
the testcases
If you have a filesystem, where everything could be a FILE_OR_FOLDER type (
or VIRTUAL until attached ), then it seems like you need to replace some of
the testcases in the
provider suites, since they assume or check for FILE and FOLDER explicitly.
I guess my question is, are the tests as they
