Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git

2016-07-15 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
+1, shading of a released jar should be preferred. But there are many solutions for deliberately using a pre-release. maven scm plugin for instance, or using the GitHub mirror's svn view. (Also +1 for move to git) On 12 Jul 2016 8:01 a.m., "Jochen Wiedmann" wrote: >

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git

2016-07-13 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Gary On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY > consensus for migrating the Apache Commons Fileupload component to git. > Please > object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote >

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git

2016-07-12 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, Konstantin, I can think of no reason, why it should be desirable to maintain a fork, rather than simply using the release jar. I strongly suggest, that Tomcat stops doing so, for examply by shading the jar, if the package names might be the problem. If required, I am quite ready to help with

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git

2016-07-12 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
I am -1 because this code is copied into Apache Tomcat, I think such migration will impede maintenance of the fork. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/fileupload/ See svn:mergeinfo at the bottom of the page. I am not on Commons PMC though, The same for

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git

2016-07-10 Thread ecki
+1 for Git -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net -Original Message- From: Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> To: Apache Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: So., 10 Juli 2016 12:46 Subject: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git Hell

[VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons Fileupload to Git

2016-07-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hello, I'd like to call a VOTE by LAZY consensus for migrating the Apache Commons Fileupload component to git. Please object to this vote if you see a problem with this. Otherwise this vote will be considered as passed after 72 hours from now (10th June 2016, 09:00 CET) Thank you, Jochen --