Phil Steitz wrote:
I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
component setup.
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours
2009/4/25 Phil Steitz
>
> [+1] Yes!
> [+0] OK
> [-0 ] not thrilled about this, but OK
> [-1 ] no, because...
>
+1
Cheers,
Dave
+1
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
> component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
> administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
> component setup.
>
> Votes
Niall Pemberton wrote:
+1, but what about the community? Are we going to have a second vote
the commiters who want to join Commons?
Yes, but I was planning to kick those votes off individually on private@
once this vote closes (assuming success).
Phil
Niall
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 AM
+1
Oliver
Phil Steitz schrieb:
I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
component setup.
Votes, please. This vote will clos
+1, but what about the community? Are we going to have a second vote
the commiters who want to join Commons?
Niall
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
> component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can
- "Phil Steitz" a écrit :
> I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
>
> component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
> administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
>
> component setup.
>
> Votes, please. This
Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
> component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
> administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
> component setup.
>
> Votes, please. This vote will close in 7
Hi folks,
here my +1
Siegfried Goeschl
Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
> component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
> administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
> component setup.
>
> V
On 25/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
> component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
> administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
> component setup.
> >
>
Phil Steitz wrote:
I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
component setup.
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours
Phil Steitz wrote:
I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
component setup.
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours
I would like to propose that we accept Sanselan as a (proper) commons
component. See [1] for background on Sanselan. We can discuss the
administrative issues in [1] as we plan and execute the svn moves and
component setup.
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours (1:00AM UTC 28-April
13 matches
Mail list logo
