On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:06:18 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:00:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
@deprecated.
?
There is no replacement.
[I've tried to explain the issue
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:04:58 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 8, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
Thank you Rob! If there are any BC breakage at all left, please note
why
they are there and why they are ok in the release notes.
Yes. that makes sense to me.
It's already there!
Gille
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:00:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
>> @deprecated.
>
> ?
> There is no replacement.
> [I've tried to explain the issue in a previous message.]
We can state
> On Aug 8, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Thank you Rob! If there are any BC breakage at all left, please note why
> they are there and why they are ok in the release notes.
Yes. that makes sense to me.
-Rob
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>> I
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:00:11 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
@deprecated.
?
There is no replacement.
[I've tried to explain the issue in a previous message.]
Gilles
Gary
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
I am cancelli
Oh and you should consider marking the API we are adding back as
@deprecated.
Gary
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> I am cancelling this vote because I personally would vote -1 on this RC.
> Many thanks to those that looked at RC6.
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
>
> > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:4
Thank you Rob! If there are any BC breakage at all left, please note why
they are there and why they are ok in the release notes.
Gary
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018, 07:48 Rob Tompkins wrote:
> I am cancelling this vote because I personally would vote -1 on this RC.
> Many thanks to those that looked at
I am cancelling this vote because I personally would vote -1 on this RC. Many
thanks to those that looked at RC6.
Cheers,
-Rob
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG 1.0 was
> released, so I would like to rele
Hi.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 21:44:05 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:25 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:48:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
Let me rephrase the question: Is the change part of what RNG
considers its
public API?
The first Clirr error was settled, a
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:25 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:48:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Let me rephrase the question: Is the change part of what RNG considers its
>> public API?
>
> The first Clirr error was settled, as noted in the JIRA ticket.
>
>> If yes,
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:48:40 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All,
Let me rephrase the question: Is the change part of what RNG
considers its
public API?
The first Clirr error was settled, as noted in the JIRA ticket.
If yes, the we must not break BC in a minor release.
1.1 should be a drop i
Hi All,
Let me rephrase the question: Is the change part of what RNG considers its
public API?
If yes, the we must not break BC in a minor release.
1.1 should be a drop in replacement to 1.0 and not cause a runtime error.
Gary
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:46 PM Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 7
Hi.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:11:30 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All:
Is this failure expected:
[INFO] --- clirr-maven-plugin:2.8:check (default-cli) @
commons-rng-sampling ---
[INFO] Comparing to version: 1.0
[ERROR] 5001:
org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.BoxMullerLogNormalSampler:
Hi All:
Is this failure expected:
[INFO] --- clirr-maven-plugin:2.8:check (default-cli) @
commons-rng-sampling ---
[INFO] Comparing to version: 1.0
[ERROR] 5001:
org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.BoxMullerLogNormalSampler:
Removed org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.SamplerBas
We have added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons RNG 1.0 was
released, so I would like to release Apache Commons RNG 1.1.
Apache Commons RNG 1.1 RC6 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rng/1.1-RC6 (svn revision
28595, site 28596)
Th
15 matches
Mail list logo
