[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-18 Thread Oliver Heger
The vote to release [configuration] 2.0-beta1 has passed with the following votes (* = binding): Gary Gregory: +1 (*) Bruno P. Kinoshita -1 Thomas Neidhart +1 (*) Phil Steitz +1 (*) Oliver Heger+1 (*) Many thanks for all reviews and comments. I will

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-18 Thread Oliver Heger
Making my vote explicit: +1 Oliver Am 14.06.2015 um 22:10 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the first beta version of [configuration] 2.0 based > on the first release candidate. After two alpha versions, it is now time > to move to a beta version. Since the last alpha versi

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-17 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Got the same test failure as Thomas and Bruno testing with Apache Maven 3.2.3 Java version: 1.8.0_45, vendor: Oracle Corporation OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.10.3", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" Checked sigs and hashes good. Distro contents look good. Jar has right contents and looks g

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-17 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 06/14/2015 10:10 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the first beta version of [configuration] 2.0 based > on the first release candidate. After two alpha versions, it is now time > to move to a beta version. Since the last alpha version, there has only > be a small change:

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-17 Thread Benedikt Ritter
o more feedback. I > will leave it still open for a while and try to prepare another RC if > there is no further reaction. > Unless there are real blockers found, you can leave the vote open as long as you want. Sometimes people just can't manage to review an RC within 72 hours. So

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-17 Thread Oliver Heger
in for the proposal. I am afraid that the vote will not pass as there is no more feedback. I will leave it still open for a while and try to prepare another RC if there is no further reaction. Oliver > > Oliver > >> >> CheersBruno >> >> From: Oliver Heger >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-15 Thread Oliver Heger
n#invalid#*path!") > by > > new File("") > Which is an invalid path too. thanks for the review. I will have a look at the problematic test case and probably follow your suggestion. But as this issue is only in test code, I would not consider this blocking. Oliver >

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-15 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
ile("this is/\\an#invalid#*path!") by new File("") Which is an invalid path too. CheersBruno From: Oliver Heger To: Commons Developers List Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:10 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1 Hi all, this is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-14 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Checked src zip, MD5, ASC OK. Builds with 'mvn clean site'. Reports OK. Tested with: Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; 2014-12-14T09:29:23-08:00) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.5 Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-beta1 based on RC1

2015-06-14 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi all, this is a vote for the first beta version of [configuration] 2.0 based on the first release candidate. After two alpha versions, it is now time to move to a beta version. Since the last alpha version, there has only be a small change: an obsolete interface has been removed. Details are ava