[RESULT] [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-22 Thread Dan Fabulich
Vote passed, unanimous +1s. (I just hope I identified roles correctly below...) http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#commons Joerg Schaible (Commons PMC) Dan Fabulich (Commons Committer) Liam Coughlin Dave Miekle Henri Yandell (Commons PMC) Phil Steitz (Commons PMC) Dan Fabulich

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dan Fabulich wrote at Donnerstag, 16. April 2009 22:06: We have a +1 from Liam Coughlin, but still need two more binding (PMC) +1s to release. No, you had two +1 from Liam and me. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-18 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: +1 from me. sigs pass. source happily rebuilds. release notes matches JIRA. license/notice look good. items in release notes all look good. +1 Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-17 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 from me. sigs pass. source happily rebuilds. release notes matches JIRA. license/notice look good. items in release notes all look good. Hen 2009/3/15 Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com [ ] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-16 Thread Dan Fabulich
We have a +1 from Liam Coughlin, but still need two more binding (PMC) +1s to release. -Dan Dan Fabulich wrote: Took me a few weeks, but I finally got around to installing a free instance of Oracle (Express Edition 10.2) and testing the null handling code we introduced in DbUtils 1.2

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-16 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, 2009/3/15 Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com [ ] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because Finally, had a chance to look at this and its a +1 from me. Cheers, Dave

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-04-13 Thread Dan Fabulich
Took me a few weeks, but I finally got around to installing a free instance of Oracle (Express Edition 10.2) and testing the null handling code we introduced in DbUtils 1.2 (DBUTILS-31). Sure enough, there's a bug, DBUTILS-55, but I don't think it's very important, since it's not a

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-17 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1, source tarball can be used to build package will all my different compilers, all tests pass. - Jörg Dan Fabulich wrote: My third attempt at releasing a commons project; please test rigorously! RC3 includes an API change to QueryRunner to guarantee thread-safety. (DBUTILS-52) NOTE:

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-16 Thread Dan Fabulich
sebb wrote: On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: The problem gets even more complicated if we tried to write a generic IntegrationTestApp to work against multiple vendors. How would the IntegrationTestApp know what column types are possible? How would it manage access to the

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-16 Thread sebb
On 16/03/2009, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: The problem gets even more complicated if we tried to write a generic IntegrationTestApp to work against multiple vendors. How would the IntegrationTestApp know

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-16 Thread James Carman
Why can't our test suite include some hsqldb-based tests? We do that at work to test our hibernate queries and stuff. Each test case class gets their own in-memory database. Performance isn't an issue On Mar 15, 2009 3:10 PM, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: My third attempt at

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-16 Thread Liam Coughlin
Unless something has changed, the current test cases do include hsqldb based tests. The specific issue is that some of the changes in the proposed 1.2 have a specific impact on specific databases ( notably, oracle ) -- so it would be extremely useful if someone who has some access to some oracle

[VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-15 Thread Dan Fabulich
My third attempt at releasing a commons project; please test rigorously! RC3 includes an API change to QueryRunner to guarantee thread-safety. (DBUTILS-52) NOTE: No one has yet explicitly said on-list that they have tested DbUtils 1.2 with a real database. We should not release it until

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-15 Thread sebb
On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: My third attempt at releasing a commons project; please test rigorously! RC3 includes an API change to QueryRunner to guarantee thread-safety. (DBUTILS-52) NOTE: No one has yet explicitly said on-list that they have tested DbUtils 1.2

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-15 Thread Dan Fabulich
sebb wrote: On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: PLEASE TEST THIS RELEASE WITH A REAL DATABASE! Although this project has reasonable unit tests, it has no integration tests with any actual databases; it is quite possible that the fix for DBUTILS-31 has broken something on

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-15 Thread Dan Fabulich
sebb wrote: Having a ready-made test app might encourage others to test as well. What do you have in mind here? An OracleTestApp class checked into our tests? Or an IntegrationTestApp that would work against multiple vendors? I can certainly imagine an OracleTestApp, but naturally I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

2009-03-15 Thread sebb
On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich d...@fabulich.com wrote: sebb wrote: Having a ready-made test app might encourage others to test as well. What do you have in mind here? An OracleTestApp class checked into our tests? Or an IntegrationTestApp that would work against multiple vendors? I