[VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-11 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC5. This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC4 +) update index and building page with correct information wrt Java compatibility +) update release notes with info on Java compatibility and Clirr errors +) f

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-11 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you for doing another RC. While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this release due to moving constants from the Email class to the newly introduced EmailConstants interface. These changes are guaranteed

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you for doing another RC. > > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this > in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this release due to > moving constants from the Email class to the newly in

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory >wrote: > > > Thank you for doing another RC. > > > > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this > > in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread sebb
On 12 December 2012 03:58, Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you for doing another RC. > > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this > in the release notes: "Clirr reports several errors for this release due to > moving constants from the Email class to the newly introduc

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread sebb
On 12 December 2012 13:17, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory > >wrote: >> >> > Thank you for doing another RC. >> > >> > While I was digging for a justification of the Clirr errors, I found this >> > i

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12 December 2012 13:17, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Thomas Neidhart > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gary Gregory >> >wrote: > >> > >> > Thank you for doing another RC. > >> > > >> > While I was d

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, to avoid the full circles here * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also tested it with my production code * I moved the constants to EmailConstants because there are many constants and using an non-trivial implementation class (Email) to access a few

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread sebb
On 12 December 2012 19:39, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > to avoid the full circles here > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > tested it with my production code > > * I moved the constants to EmailConstants because there are many constants > and us

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12 December 2012 19:39, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > to avoid the full circles here > > > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > > tested it with my production code > > > > * I moved the cons

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 12/12/2012 08:39 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > to avoid the full circles here > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > tested it with my production code > > * I moved the constants to EmailConstants because there are many > constants and usi

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Thomas, there is some code out there using it to build emails based on maps https://turbine.apache.org/fulcrum/fulcrum-commonsemail/xref/index.html AFAIK we are free to drop deprecated stuff when doing a minor release - which of course breaks binary compatibility. Cheers, Siegfried Goesc

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 12/12/2012 08:39 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > to avoid the full circles here > > > > * I hopefully fixed the binary compatibility issue, wrote test and also > > tested it with my production code > > > > * I moved th

Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > there is some code out there using it to build emails based on maps > > https://turbine.apache.org/**fulcrum/fulcrum-commonsemail/** > xref/index.html

Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5

2012-12-12 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Original Message Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of commons-email-1.3 based on RC5 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:49:39 +0100 From: Siegfried Goeschl Reply-To: sgoes...@gmx.at To: Gary Gregory Hi Gary, just checked the Apache site and you are right - no way to remove a deprecated