On May 26, 2016 2:31 PM, "Jochen Wiedmann"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> > Who wants to do the first one? That person could doc the experience for
the
> > next person.
>
> Pointing to the next person in the
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Who wants to do the first one? That person could doc the experience for the
> next person.
Pointing to the next person in the circle (clockwise).
Jochen
Who wants to do the first one? That person could doc the experience for the
next person.
Gary
On May 26, 2016 2:13 PM, "Jochen Wiedmann"
wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
> wrote:
>
> > We can start with VFS, then perhaps
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> We can start with VFS, then perhaps IO and Collections?
Fine with me. Could we add Fileupload to the queue as the next element?
Jochen
-
To
On 26 May 2016 at 11:44, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On 25 May 2016 at 20:06, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> I haven't done git migrations too often. The last time I can remember, all
>> the issues on github were closed automatically. I don't remember why. INFRA
On 25 May 2016 at 20:06, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> I haven't done git migrations too often. The last time I can remember, all
> the issues on github were closed automatically. I don't remember why. INFRA
> had to reopen the issues manually.
OK, that's another good argument for
Hi,
Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Mi., 25. Mai 2016 um
18:11 Uhr:
> +1 for a general move to git, even if it is done one-by-one by lazy
> consensus.
>
> I guess on moving, INFRA do not need to remove the old mirrored
> repository in GitHub? (It should be mirrored form the
On May 25, 2016 9:11 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote:
>
> +1 for a general move to git, even if it is done one-by-one by lazy
consensus.
>
> I guess on moving, INFRA do not need to remove the old mirrored
> repository in GitHub? (It should be mirrored form the same location).
>
+1 for a general move to git, even if it is done one-by-one by lazy consensus.
I guess on moving, INFRA do not need to remove the old mirrored
repository in GitHub? (It should be mirrored form the same location).
Otherwise we need to be worried about open pull requests, link to
forks, etc.
We
Gary Gregory schrieb am Di., 24. Mai 2016 um
23:03 Uhr:
> I think we have to do 1-by-1 with infra anyway but I'd prefer to do it all.
> My guess from recollections from previous email threads is that folks would
> rather do this 1-by-1. You could start a [POLL] thread.
>
I think we have to do 1-by-1 with infra anyway but I'd prefer to do it all.
My guess from recollections from previous email threads is that folks would
rather do this 1-by-1. You could start a [POLL] thread.
Gary
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
> I would
I would nominate VFS to move to git, the question is do we keep want to do that
one by one?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory
To: Commons Developers List
Cc: annou...@apache.org, Commons
12 matches
Mail list logo