Preparing RC2.
Regards,
Gilles
On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:19:33 +0100, Gilles wrote:
Hello.
I would like to release Apache Commons RNG v1.2.
Apache Commons RNG 1.2 RC1 is available for review:
[...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 6:37 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 10:58, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 21:29:26 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> With:
>>>
>>> $ mvn -version
>>> Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
>>> 2018-06-17T14:33:14-04:00)
>>> Maven
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:37:25 +, sebb wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 10:58, Gilles
wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 21:29:26 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> With:
>
> $ mvn -version
> Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
> 2018-06-17T14:33:14-04:00)
> Maven home: /usr/local/Cell
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 10:58, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 21:29:26 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> > With:
> >
> > $ mvn -version
> > Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
> > 2018-06-17T14:33:14-04:00)
> > Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.5.4/libexec
> > Java ver
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 21:29:26 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
With:
$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
2018-06-17T14:33:14-04:00)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.5.4/libexec
Java version: 9.0.4, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtu
With:
$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.5.4 (1edded0938998edf8bf061f1ceb3cfdeccf443fe;
2018-06-17T14:33:14-04:00)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.5.4/libexec
Java version: 9.0.4, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-9.0.4.jdk/Contents/Home
Default locale:
On 04/12/2018 22:29, Gilles wrote:
I was in fact running Java 10 for the benchmarks: "BoxMuller" is indeed
50% faster on it than on Java 8 and "Marsaglia" 10% slower!
Interesting. Given the relative popularity of Java 10 vs 8 (Java 10 was
only out in March 2018 and usage statistics are unknown
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:33:48 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
On 04/12/2018 15:15, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables
following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verse
Results with 20 iterations:
RNG BoxMuller Marsaglia Ziggurat
ISAAC 0.948779993 0.53293786390.2799722904
JDK 1.06528391790.64108084960.3241359248
KISS0.98570743390.47010378670.2574427254
MT 1.02886323360.54358466380.2935301968
MT_64
On 04/12/2018 15:15, Gilles wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the BoxMullerNo
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:11:44 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I’ll try to get to validation on this by the end of the day,
Thanks!
unless
@Gilles, you want to take into account the vote below.
I don't think anything mentioned is blocking (cf. my answer
in the other post).
[Hmm, it mostly stems fr
On 04/12/2018 14:08, Alex Herbert wrote:
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the BoxMullerNormalizedGaussianSampler
have all improved nearly 2-fold which is
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
>> +0 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
>> the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
>> 1.1). I note t
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:08:59 +, Alex Herbert wrote:
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the
BoxMullerNormalizedGaussianSampler
have all i
I’ll try to get to validation on this by the end of the day, unless @Gilles,
you want to take into account the vote below.
-Rob
> On Dec 4, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Alex Herbert wrote:
>
> +0 (non-binding)
>
>
> The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following the
> changes to
+0 (non-binding)
The user guide shows updated Performance and Quality tables following
the changes to the core implementation for all tables (verses release
1.1). I note that the times for the BoxMullerNormalizedGaussianSampler
have all improved nearly 2-fold which is strange. The code appear
Hello.
I would like to release Apache Commons RNG v1.2.
Apache Commons RNG 1.2 RC1 is available for review:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rng/1.2-RC1 (svn
revision 31333)
The Git tag for this RC is "RNG_1_2_RC1":
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.
17 matches
Mail list logo