On 28 March 2013 18:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 05:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Beside that, there are lots of weird concepts and my favorite is
> voting for the content of web site.
It's included in the RC vote so people can review it.
We have never pulled an RC purely because the
On 03/28/2013 05:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
But binary packages including the jars, the sources, the compiled tests,
the dependencies and the javadoc are just redundant with the other Maven
artifacts.
Agreed.
Those could/should be part of "standard" distribution method.
Some times we just o
Le 28/03/2013 16:20, Mladen Turk a écrit :
> Well, I find it a bit discriminating to host only java code with Maven ;)
>
> With binaries (even native like with daemon) one can easily create a pom
> that would pull everything without the need to setup gazillion of
> main/archive/mirror sites, etc.
>
>> There's only a slightly problem with that approach: the Maven central
>> repo is not under the ASF control, while the old traditional dist area
>> is, so I guess "official" releases _must_ be placed in the ASF space.
>
> I agree, our releases must go to an ASF space first. However one could
>
Le 28/03/2013 16:15, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
> There's only a slightly problem with that approach: the Maven central
> repo is not under the ASF control, while the old traditional dist area
> is, so I guess "official" releases _must_ be placed in the ASF space.
I agree, our releases must go to a
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 03:33 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> I don't think we can speak about "standard" practices, but Maven
>> itself[1] publishes -src and -bin artifacts on the central repo.
>>
>> +1 on NOT publishing them on central repo, but we sh
Le 28/03/2013 16:16, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> The definitive location for ASF software distributions is the apache
> mirrors. That is what we monitor, point to on the web pages, vouch
> for, etc. Downstream packagers, distributors - *including Maven
> central* - can do what they want and projects
On 03/28/2013 03:33 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
I don't think we can speak about "standard" practices, but Maven
itself[1] publishes -src and -bin artifacts on the central repo.
+1 on NOT publishing them on central repo, but we should find an
automated way to deploy them on SvnPubSub along the sig
On 3/28/13 7:39 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/03/2013 15:29, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>
>> Why? IMHO packagers should be using the "usual" distribution mirror
>> system.
> Sure that's what they do. But the "usual" location is different for
> every library. If it can be standardized within the
Salut Manu,
>
> Sure that's what they do. But the "usual" location is different for
> every library. If it can be standardized within the Maven infrastructure
> that would greatly simplify the downstream packaging. Any library (from
> Apache or elsewhere) could be downloaded in a buildable form di
Le 28/03/2013 15:29, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> Why? IMHO packagers should be using the "usual" distribution mirror
> system.
Sure that's what they do. But the "usual" location is different for
every library. If it can be standardized within the Maven infrastructure
that would greatly simplify t
I don't think we can speak about "standard" practices, but Maven
itself[1] publishes -src and -bin artifacts on the central repo.
+1 on NOT publishing them on central repo, but we should find an
automated way to deploy them on SvnPubSub along the signature and
checksums.
best,
-Simo
[1] http://r
On 2013-03-28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed that for the recent releases the source and binary
> packages have been published in the Maven repository. I saw that with
> fileupload 1.3 and daemon >= 1.0.11.
> Is this a "standard" practice?
I would hope it is not. When I released
This might have been unintentional. In the past, we've always made a point
of NOT putting -src and -bin zips/tars in Maven Central.
Has this policy changed with the new svnpubsub?
Gary
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that for the recent release
Hi,
I just noticed that for the recent releases the source and binary
packages have been published in the Maven repository. I saw that with
fileupload 1.3 and daemon >= 1.0.11.
Is this a "standard" practice?
I find this very interesting because the sources.jar usually shipped is
great for browsi
15 matches
Mail list logo
