Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Hi Simon, The best thing to do IMO is to go through Jira and Github and address any issues, especially ones that require breaking binary compatibility. A major release like this one is the only opportunity we have to make breaking changes. Let's make sure we take advantage of it. One issue is

Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Hi Gary, is there anything that can be done to help addressing the issues that prevent beanutils2 from being released? It's blocking the upgrade of a few dozen other open-source libraries, which in turn causes dependencies on commons-collections v3 all over the place. Please let me know if I

Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM Simon Ochsenreither wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I added the Automatic Module Name and sent a PR request > (https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/4) a while ago ... is > there > anything I can do to help moving this forward? > In svn trunk now. Tracking with

Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Hi Gary, I added the Automatic Module Name and sent a PR request (https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/4) a while ago ... is there anything I can do to help moving this forward? Thanks, Simon

Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Hi Simon. You're welcome :-) I do not have a schedule. I would guess within a month, Please provide a PR for your change, it's just so much easier for me to deal with. Also please review what we have in Git master now. I encourage you to test your software with a SNAPSHOT version to make sure

Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Hi Gary, first of all thanks for doing all the work and updating these libraries. Two short questions: - Do you have an estimated time until beanutils2 ships (days, weeks, months)? - Would it be possible to add a Automatic-Module-Name entry to the MANIFEST.MF file for better Java 9 support?

Re: [BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Long term I think we can get rid of the dependency on Commons Collection by updating to Java 8 and lambas. So an incremental plan could be: - Now: BeanUtils 1.x (commons-beanutils) depends on Commons Collection 3 (commons-collections). - Next: BeanUtils 2.x (commons-beanutils2) depends on Commons

[BeanUtils] Release 2.0.0 soonish

Hi All: Once I am done with releasing Commons Collections 4.2, I plan on releasing Commons BeanUtils 2. This will be a major version change due to the update from Commons Collections 3 to 4. If you want to change BeanUtils so that Commons Collections classes are NOT surfaced in the BeanUtils

Re: [beanutils] release?

On 6 February 2018 at 05:04, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: >> >>> Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more

Re: [beanutils] release?

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: > >> Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more grand with >> beanutils, can we put out the current state of beanutils as 2.0 so we

Re: [beanutils] release?

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Dave Brosius wrote: > Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more grand with beanutils, > can we put out the current state of beanutils as 2.0 so we can get rid of > the old commons-collections dependency, and then if folks would

[beanutils] release?

Given the lack of impetus around doing anything more grand with beanutils, can we put out the current state of beanutils as 2.0 so we can get rid of the old commons-collections dependency, and then if folks would like, we can think about moving on with what's on the alternative branch in the

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > > > Am 01.06.2016 um 22:09 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger < > oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Am 31.05.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: >

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

Am 01.06.2016 um 22:09 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> >> >> Am 31.05.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: >>> While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes, I would not mind >>> pushing out a release,

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > > > Am 31.05.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes, I would not mind > > pushing out a release, just to get the refreshed dependency on Commons > >

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

Am 31.05.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: > While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes, I would not mind > pushing out a release, just to get the refreshed dependency on Commons > Collection out since there has been noise about it related to security. > > Thoughts? +1, would it

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

Go for it! dbrosIus <dbros...@baybroadband.net> schrieb am Di., 31. Mai 2016 um 23:35: > +1 > > Original message > From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > Date: 05/31/2016 5:31 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.

RE: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

+1 Original message From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> Date: 05/31/2016 5:31 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: [beanutils] release 1.9.3? While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes, I would not

[beanutils] release 1.9.3?

While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes, I would not mind pushing out a release, just to get the refreshed dependency on Commons Collection out since there has been noise about it related to security. Thoughts? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java