Re: [compress] Some Compressor Benchmarks

2017-02-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-02-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > While I was at it I thought it would be nice to compare the performance > of the compression formats we support: > > https://github.com/bodewig/commons-compress-benchmarks/wiki/Comparison-of-Compression-Formats > As expected the performance of the zlib

Re: [compress] Some Compressor Benchmarks

2017-02-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-02-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2017-02-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> I'll write benchmarks for the Checksum algos next, it might be the >> xxhash32 implementation being slower than the crc32-c we've got. > It is, by a factor of two. It was, by now xxhash32 is a tiny bit faster :-)

Re: [compress] Some Compressor Benchmarks

2017-02-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-02-25, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I'll write benchmarks for the Checksum algos next, it might be the > xxhash32 implementation being slower than the crc32-c we've got. It is, by a factor of two. Stefan - To unsubscribe,

[compress] Some Compressor Benchmarks

2017-02-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all I've started to play with jmh[1] a bit, primarily as I wanted to tune the LZ77 code a little before proposing the next release. Code is in my github space[2] While I was at it I thought it would be nice to compare the performance of the compression formats we support: