On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 16:25, James Carman wrote:
>> We could say we support short-term storage (or transmission-only) only when
>> it comes to serialization. That would help eliminate some of the burden
>
> Perhaps, but why take on any burden without a go
On 12 March 2012 16:25, James Carman wrote:
> We could say we support short-term storage (or transmission-only) only when
> it comes to serialization. That would help eliminate some of the burden
Perhaps, but why take on any burden without a good use case?
Any form of serialisation adds extra te
We could say we support short-term storage (or transmission-only) only when
it comes to serialization. That would help eliminate some of the burden
On Mar 12, 2012 11:23 AM, "sebb" wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 09:02, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> >> Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Bened
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 09:02, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> >> Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> >>
> >>> I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
> >>> provide a no-arg constructor nor
On 12 March 2012 09:02, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>>
>>> I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
>>> provide a no-arg constructor nor any of the special serialization
>>> methods (and it has no cu
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>
>> I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
>> provide a no-arg constructor nor any of the special serialization
>> methods (and it has no custom serialUID). Is this the way it is
>> supposed to
Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
provide a no-arg constructor nor any of the special serialization
methods (and it has no custom serialUID). Is this the way it is
supposed to be?
I wrote a test and it seems th
On 11 March 2012 23:27, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
>> provide a no-arg constructor nor any of the special serialization
>> methods (and it has no custom serialUID). Is
Le 12/03/2012 00:16, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Hi,
I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
provide a no-arg constructor nor any of the special serialization
methods (and it has no custom serialUID). Is this the way it is
supposed to be?
That's a good point, thank
Hi,
I just saw that CSVFormat implements Serializable, but neither does it
provide a no-arg constructor nor any of the special serialization
methods (and it has no custom serialUID). Is this the way it is
supposed to be?
Benedikt
--
10 matches
Mail list logo