Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Phil Steitz w

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Phil Steitz a écrit : >> >>> Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Phil Steitz a écrit : > Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> Phil Steitz a écrit : >> >> >>> Phil Steitz wrote: >>>

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Phil Steitz wrote: I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Phil Steitz a écrit : >> >>> Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> Phil Steitz a écrit : > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: >> >> "The Apache com

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Phil Steitz wrote: I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyrig

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Phil Steitz a écrit : >> >>> Phil Steitz wrote: >>> I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyright notices

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Phil Steitz wrote: I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source code for the t

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Phil Steitz wrote: I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source code for the t

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Phil Steitz wrote: >> I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: >> >> "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with >> separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source >> code for the these subcomponent

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Phil Steitz wrote: I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and condit

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate: "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and conditions of the followin

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

sebb a écrit : > On 28/07/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> sebb a écrit : >> >>> On 25/07/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ >> > >> > Sigs OK, but the MD5 and SHA1 hashes are different from usual: >> > >> > MD5(commons-math-2.0-RC1.tar.gz)= 3

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

On 28/07/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > sebb a écrit : > > > On 25/07/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ > > > > Sigs OK, but the MD5 and SHA1 hashes are different from usual: > > > > MD5(commons-math-2.0-RC1.tar.gz)= 3117860975931ae8e16d60ece

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

sebb a écrit : > On 25/07/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ > > Sigs OK, but the MD5 and SHA1 hashes are different from usual: > > MD5(commons-math-2.0-RC1.tar.gz)= 3117860975931ae8e16d60ece525b211 > > This complicates checking them. > > The no

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

sebb wrote: On 25/07/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ Sigs OK, but the MD5 and SHA1 hashes are different from usual: MD5(commons-math-2.0-RC1.tar.gz)= 3117860975931ae8e16d60ece525b211 This complicates checking them. The normal format

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

On 25/07/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ Sigs OK, but the MD5 and SHA1 hashes are different from usual: MD5(commons-math-2.0-RC1.tar.gz)= 3117860975931ae8e16d60ece525b211 This complicates checking them. The normal format is: 3117860975931ae8e

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

- Original Message - From: "Phil Steitz" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 2:57 PM Subject: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/

Re: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

Phil Steitz a écrit : > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ Seems good to me. Thanks Phil, Luc > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@c

[math] 2.0 RC1 available for review

http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org