Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-05 Thread sebb
On 5 October 2011 02:05, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/4/11 4:26 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-05 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:05:12PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 10/4/11 4:26 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to declare

[math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Phil Steitz
I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to declare the MathXxException. We should probably be consistent. I don't know if it really makes any difference. I see

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Gilles Sadowski
I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to declare the MathXxException. We should probably be consistent. I don't know if it really makes any

Re: [math] advertising MathXxExceptions

2011-10-04 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/4/11 4:26 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: I have been leaving the standard exception advertisements alone as I s/MathRuntimeException.createXxException/new MathXxException, but I notice others are changing the @throws to declare the MathXxException. We should probably be consistent. I don't