Hello,
Le 14/11/2011 16:34, luc.maison...@free.fr a écrit :
> Hi Gilles,
>
> - Mail original -
>> Hi.
>>
[...]
>
> In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be
> set
at
> the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa,
> Ne
Hi Gilles,
- Mail original -
> Hi.
>
> > > [...]
> > >>
> > >> In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be
> > >> set
> > >at
> > >> the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa,
> > >> Nelder-Mead and MultiDirectional.
> > >
> > >You are right but
Hi.
> > [...]
> >>
> >> In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be set
> >at
> >> the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa,
> >> Nelder-Mead and MultiDirectional.
> >
> >You are right but this was considered as a compromise in order to avoid
> >an
> >ad
Le 10/11/2011 23:39, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
>
>> [...]
>
>>
>> Another argument for not hiding the mapping is that another poor
man's
>> approach is to use a penalty (when the optimizer's "guess" falls
out of
>> bounds) and I wonder whether some algorithm cou
Hi.
> [...]
> >>>
>
> Another argument for not hiding the mapping is that another poor
> >> man's
> approach is to use a penalty (when the optimizer's "guess" falls
> >> out of
> bounds) and I wonder whether some algorithm could behave better
> >> with one or
> the other a
Le 09/11/2011 22:44, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
>
>
>
> Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
>> Hello.
>>
>>
>> Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
>> optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and
>> CMA-ES, as
>> both method naturally support
Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>Hello.
>
>> >>>
>> >>> Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
>> >>> optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and
>CMA-ES, as
>> >>> both method naturally support such constraints.
>> >>>
>> >>> I wondered if we could take
Hello.
> >>>
> >>> Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
> >>> optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
> >>> both method naturally support such constraints.
> >>>
> >>> I wondered if we could take the opportunity to set up a poor man
> >
Hi Gilles,
Le 08/11/2011 16:29, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>>> Hi all,
>
> Hi Luc.
>
>>>
>>> Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
>>> optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
>>> both method naturally support such constraints.
>>>
>>> I
> > Hi all,
Hi Luc.
> >
> > Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
> > optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
> > both method naturally support such constraints.
> >
> > I wondered if we could take the opportunity to set up a poor man
Le 07/11/2011 22:38, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
> optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
> both method naturally support such constraints.
>
> I wondered if we could take the opportunity
Hi all,
Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
both method naturally support such constraints.
I wondered if we could take the opportunity to set up a poor man
implementation in the abstract base c
12 matches
Mail list logo
