Re: [math] freezing current state for release ?

2009-07-06 Thread Luc Maisonobe
John Bollinger a écrit : > > > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> I have tried some workarounds to remove the 7 warnings I get in >> Frequency (3 concerning use of raw types, 4 concerning type safety). I >> did not succeed in reducing the number of warnings, I only moved them >> around or even increased th

Re: [math] freezing current state for release ?

2009-07-06 Thread John Bollinger
Luc Maisonobe wrote: > I have tried some workarounds to remove the 7 warnings I get in > Frequency (3 concerning use of raw types, 4 concerning type safety). I > did not succeed in reducing the number of warnings, I only moved them > around or even increased the number. Does someone smarter tha

Re: [math] freezing current state for release ?

2009-07-05 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Luc Maisonobe" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 9:22 AM Subject: [math] freezing current state for release ? Hello all, I am still struggling to implement properly an efficient Backward Differential Formu

Re: [math] freezing current state for release ?

2009-07-05 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hello all, I am still struggling to implement properly an efficient Backward Differential Formulas (BDF) integrator for stiff problems in the ODE package, to solve MATH-172. I fear I won't be able to finish this soon. As the release of 2.0 is now mostly blocked by this issue

[math] freezing current state for release ?

2009-07-05 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hello all, I am still struggling to implement properly an efficient Backward Differential Formulas (BDF) integrator for stiff problems in the ODE package, to solve MATH-172. I fear I won't be able to finish this soon. As the release of 2.0 is now mostly blocked by this issue, I would propose to po